3

Shield Warrior

You have mastered the art of using shields as weapons. You gain the following benefits:

  • You can benefit from up to 2 shields (including stacking their bonuses to AC).

  • When using a shield as an improvised weapon, you have proficiency with it.

  • You can don or doff two shields when you would normally only be able to don or doff one.

How does this compare to existing RAW feats, balance-wise?

Known interactions

Shield Master

  • Completely non-redundant with Shield Warrior
  • Possible balance issue with adding the AC bonus of two shields to Dex saves when combined with Shield Warrior

Tavern Brawler

  • Proficiency with improvised weapons overlaps with Shield Warrior's proficiency with improvised weapons (shields)

Dual Wielder

Community
  • 1
Vigil
  • 19,109
  • 11
  • 93
  • 193
  • Is the point of it to be able to create a mini PC version of Fire Giant Dreadnoughts from VGtM? – J.E Jun 15 '18 at 13:25
  • @J.E That's one example that I had in mind, yeah. But the FGD has lots of abilities a PC with this wouldn't. – Vigil Jun 15 '18 at 13:31

1 Answers1

4

It's not overpowered under most circumstances

Assuming non-magical shields, it compares fairly well with Dual Wielder. Dual Wielder gives +1 AC and allows two-handed fighting with non-light weapons. Your feat gives 3 AC more when shields are held but doesn't allow two-weapon fighting and indeed only works when the character wields a shield, which is a pretty bad weapon even if you have proficiency with it. It's a fair trade.

I expect it can become overpowered when the character with this feat has access to multiple magical shields with convenient synergy, eg. Shield of Missile attraction and Arrow-Catching Shield.

It's not a good feat

Giving away offensive capability for defensive capability (in this case, by dual-wielding shields) tends to draw out combats because it reduces the expected damage output of both sides. Balanced or not, I think that's a good enough reason to not introduce this feat in your game.

kviiri
  • 53,985
  • 17
  • 201
  • 262
  • 2
    Is a warcaster cleric (Holy symbol on a shield) a consideration when looking at balance? No real loss of offence but hugely improved AC. – SeriousBri Jun 15 '18 at 12:05
  • 3
    @SeriousBri wouldn't the two shields interfere with certain spells (mainly the ones with somatic but no material components)? – J.E Jun 15 '18 at 12:12
  • @J.E possibly, to be honest I have never played at a table that even considers v,s,m in normal play, which only increases the power of this mobile one man shield wall. – SeriousBri Jun 15 '18 at 13:14
  • 1
    Wielding two shields not only makes somatic components impossible, it also makes doing anything at all with your hands impossible. ANd it takes an action to remove a shield (which, how do you do that if you don't have a free hand?) – NotArch Jun 15 '18 at 13:33
  • @NautArch in this case you do it even faster then with just one shield and no feat :-) Maybe you have it on a piece of string and you just kinda drop them to dangle..? – J.E Jun 15 '18 at 13:43
  • 1
    @NautArch because of the feat, which says: "You can don or doff two shields when you would normally only be able to don or doff one." – Erik Jun 15 '18 at 13:53
  • @Erik d'oh! Reading fail. My other points do remain in that you no longer have hands to use while wielding like this. It's not like a two-handed weapon where you can release a hand. – NotArch Jun 15 '18 at 13:54
  • 1
    @NautArch I took magical shields into brief consideration (see the middle paragraph) – kviiri Jun 15 '18 at 14:04
  • To be honest if I had thjs feat I woukd make an untouchable Vocal spell caster. Then again there are some official feats that are equally ridiculous with specialized builds – David Coffron Jun 15 '18 at 14:57