Questions tagged [finance-mathematics]

Financial mathematics, or mathematical finance, is a set of mathematical tools allowing to express use cases on financial markets a way that can (or could) be solved using mathematics.

They are a lot of branches of financial maths:

  • Modern Portfolio Theory is one of them: how to express portfolio management using mathematical formulas (and how does it leads to different solutions)? Think about Markowitz portfolios of course, but also about Black and Litterman ones too, or about Merton's intertemporal portfolios.
  • Derivative pricing is another one: how to express the implementation cost of a contingent claim (and how it leads to the best way to replicate it)? This about Black and Scholes' option pricing of course.
  • Optimal trading is a third one: how to write down the situation faced by a trader (or a market maker) having an inventory and trading with other market participants (and how it leads to optimal quotes or an optimal trading speed)? Algren-Chriss or Cartea-Jaimungal trade scheduling or Avellaneda-Stoikov+Guéant-Lehalle market making modeling are of this kind.

Financial mathematics do not tell you what is the appropriate model for a given practical situation, but tells you that "if you see the world this way, then an optimal decision process should drive you in this direction" (please take optimality in a very broad sense, financial maths do not tell you if agents are rational or not).

449 questions
7
votes
3 answers

Black Scholes Constant Implied Volatility

I hope someone can clarify my ideas about the constant implied volatility in the classical Black Scholes framework. As well known, market practitioners quote the prices of vanilla call and put options in terms of implied volatilities. For inputs…
Tinkerbell
  • 353
  • 2
  • 13
5
votes
1 answer

Law of iterated expectation for the pricing of a Zero Recovery Risky Zero Coupon Bond

I am currently reading "Modelling single-name and multi-name credit derivatives" by Dom O'Kane but I struggle at one point that should be relatively easy. Let us consider a Zero Recovery Risky Zero Coupon Bond, that is to say a bond that pays 1 in…
cp123456
  • 129
  • 6
3
votes
1 answer

Fixed Payment at Default - Pricing

Let us consider a product paying an amount of 1 if default (τ
cp123456
  • 129
  • 6
3
votes
1 answer

Zero coupon bond calculations

I am given the following forward rate dynamics $df(t,u)=\frac{\partial}{\partial u}(\frac{\sigma^2}{2})dt-\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\sigma dW$ and want to calculate the dynamics of the ZCB $p$ via the computations below. The second equality is…
user123124
  • 307
  • 1
  • 7
3
votes
1 answer

How to comprehend this notation?

I learned mathematical finance from Bjork's Arbitrage Theory in Continous Time, and never once did I encounter the "quadratic variation"-thingy with the angle brackets. So now that I am reading Bergomi's book on Stochastic Volatility and I run into…
SarahKuch
  • 31
  • 1
2
votes
0 answers

Proving that the return from the butterfly spread is nonnegative

The butterfly spread satisfies the inequality c(X1) - 2c(X2) + c(X3) >= 0 Where call strikes satisfy X1
Jordan Man
  • 21
  • 1
2
votes
2 answers

Force of interest third degree polynomial

Just struggling with a question here, any help would be appreciated. For its deposits, a bank offers a force of interest per annum over a given year, which equals 4.99% at the beginning of the year, 5.33% after three months, 5.75% after six months,…
1
vote
1 answer

Discrete self financing strategy

Let $H$ be an investment strategy in a discrete price model. Proof $H$ is self financing if and only if the following holds for the portfolio process $P_t$: $$P_t = P_0 + \sum_{s=1}^tH_{s-1}(X_s-X_{s-1}) \quad \forall t=1,…
uhmmm
  • 11
  • 1
1
vote
1 answer

Integrable cumulative income process

I am trying to read Karatzas/Shreve "Methods of Mathematical Finance". In ch. 1, Definition 5.5, a cumulative income process $\Gamma(t)=\Gamma^{\mathrm{fv}}(t)+\Gamma^\mathrm{lm}(t)$ (a semimartingale under the original measure $P$) is defined to be…
jacques
  • 186
  • 5
1
vote
1 answer

Using the call option to solve this linear program

Hello I have to do a project for a finance class and the Professor has given us the following problem. I'm not a finance student and am just now being introduced to the subject. I do not understand this problem at all. All Im asking is if someone…
Lion Heart
  • 11
  • 2
1
vote
0 answers

The deflator of reinsurance market is unique

How to prove that the deflator $\phi$ of the reinsurance market is unique when working in the equilibrium model? That is, if we have a pricing function $\pi$, which satisfies: $$\pi(Y)=E(\phi Y)$$ Then $\phi$ is unique. The pricing function is a…
Dole
  • 161
  • 2
1
vote
0 answers

Bond price formula, redemption yield and no arbitrage

Given the 1 year bond with a price 98 and C as 8% on face value 100. I want to find the implied single compounding interest rate. I can solve for r via the bond price formula or I can just set up the equation 98(1+r)=106 and solve for r and it…
user496975
  • 13
  • 2
1
vote
1 answer

Finding rate of return of bond sold before maturity

You purchase a bond today for $980; M=$1000, the coupon rate is 4% paid semi-annually, and there are n=7 years to maturity. If you sell the bond for $1025 in six months time, what is your rate of return? Would I be correct in saying that the rate…
CcS
  • 153
  • 5
0
votes
0 answers

Follow-up Fixed Payment at Default - Pricing

This question is a follow-up of this question Fixed Payment at Default - Pricing for more clarity. Starting from the following expression of payoff: $$ D(0,T) = E(\exp(-\int_{0}^{\tau} r(t)dt) \cdot \mathbb{1}_{\{\tau \leq T\}}) $$ and knowing…
cp123456
  • 129
  • 6
0
votes
0 answers

Elliott and Kopp Mathematics of Financial Markets confusion about proof of Lemma 2.2.5

In the book "Mathematics of Financial Markets" by R. J. Elliott and P. E. Kopp, Second Edition there is a claim made in the proof of Lemma 2.2.5., namely that $V_0(\theta)=V_0(\phi)$. I don't see why this would hold without making a rather long…
L. t.
  • 101
  • 1
1
2