4

I am confused about the notation in my Stochastic Processes class, and I can't find a place in the textbook that explicitly defines this notation. He uses $E$ to mean simple expectation i.e. for tail sum formula for expectation it is written $$EX = \sum_{k = 1}^\infty P(X \ge k)$$ Then in the next paragraph, he writes that the probability of returning at least $k$ times $\{N(y) \ge k\}$ is $$E_xN(y) = \sum_{k = 1}P(N(y) \ge k) = \cdots = {\rho_{xy} \over 1 - \rho_{yy}}$$ where I added the \cdots because the calculations aren't relevant.

As a direct consequence of this, I am confused about what the "limiting fraction of time we spend in each state" theorem is saying. It goes as follows:

Theorem 1.21 (Asymptotic Frequency). Suppose our Markov Chains is irreducible and all states are recurrent. If $N_n(y)$ is the number of visits to $y$ up to time $n$, then $${N_n(y) \over n} \to {1 \over E_yT_y}$$

where $T_y$ is defined to be $T_y^1$ for $$T_y^k = \min\{n > T_y^{k-1}: X_n = y\}$$ i.e. the time of first return to $y$.

Moderat
  • 859

1 Answers1

4

As you can see from the remark of Stephane followed by confirming remarks by me and cardinal that E$_y$T$_y$ is the expected value of the first return time to y because E$_y$ mean expectation conditional on

X$_1$=y.

  • I realize this is a meta comment/question, but do you see the comments to the OP in a different order than they show in my browser? – cardinal Sep 23 '12 at 17:38
  • Sorry Cardinal. Your comment came in slightly ahead of Stephane. I missed yours and responded to Stephane. So when I noticed your I thought it came later. I did not check the times. You probably were writing your comments at overlapping times. – Michael R. Chernick Sep 23 '12 at 18:00
  • No problem. The comments do appear to be within a couple minutes of each other. I was mostly just curious if there was a technical reason (i.e., bug), since the order of comments can be important in other situations. – cardinal Sep 23 '12 at 19:41
  • @cardinal I think that the order was reversed and that may explain why I thought Stephane's comment came in first but it does seem to be corrected now. – Michael R. Chernick Sep 23 '12 at 21:01