2

Are there any signs / military observations that Russia is preparing for a military attack against Finland and Sweden to delay NATO's admitting Finland and Sweden?

convert
  • 1
  • 24
  • 115
  • 186
tinystone
  • 159
  • 4

2 Answers2

6

No, in fact Putin has explicitly drawn a distinction between Sweden/Finland joining NATO and Ukraine.

"We do not have such problems with Sweden and Finland, which, unfortunately, we have with Ukraine. We have no territorial issues… no disputes… we have nothing that could bother us from the point of view of Finland's or Sweden's membership in NATO.

He did however say that if NATO infrastructure is deployed in Finland and Sweden, then Russia will respond.

"Only they should plainly and clearly realize that there were no threats before, now, if military contingents and infrastructure are deployed there, we will have to respond in a mirror manner and create the same threats to the territories from which threats are created to us," he stressed.

So if Russia attacks Finland/Sweden, it won't be to "delay" NATO admitting them, it'll be because of NATO deployment in those countries.

Allure
  • 34,557
  • 16
  • 102
  • 190
  • 2
    Russia was denying the would invade Ukraine until a few days before. In fact you posted an answer here (that you've since deleted) calling such talk "Western hysteria". Nowadays Putin's words are worth a lot less than satellite imagery. – the gods from engineering Jul 07 '22 at 03:40
  • @Fizz sure. But any other answer is still speculation. And I acknowledged that answer was wrong by deleting it. I don't see you deleting your blatant falsehoods in this answer: https://politics.stackexchange.com/a/73803 – Allure Jul 07 '22 at 03:41
2

No large scale troops movements have been reported in the press (in the direction of Finland), but then with Russia still making slow progress in Ukraine, I'm not sure anyone is expecting a quick Russian blow in the north. If anything, satellite pictures show that some troops located near the border with Finland have departed possibly to reinforce the offensive in Ukraine. Some (former) officials from the Finnish defense establishment gave a similar assessment.

Some sources claimed Iskander ballistic missile batteries were seen moving towards Finland, but they turned out to be anti-ship missiles, and Finnish authorities dismissed the move as routine. According to Swedish authorities, some Russian bombers entered Swedish airspace around Gotland in March. A similar incident happened in May but involving a "spy plane". However the latter kind of actions are probably nothing more than intimidation attempts. (Finland also reported a couple of airspace violations this year, although it's more debatable if those were intended to send some kind of message or were accidental, given the transport nature of the helicopter & aircraft involved.)

The "any signs" part of the Q might be a bit speculative... especially regarding long[er]-term plans. One should remember that the densely populated area of Finland is not large (despite the otherwise lengthy border) and that e.g. in 2008 Russia managed to concentrate significant forces to strike into Georgia in approximately one week after the border incidents intensified. In that conflict, Russia also launched (surprise) amphibious operations that the Finish coast is also susceptible to, at least in theory.

It's also worth recalling, however, that Finland and Sweden are in the EU, which has a mutual defense clause of its own, albeit having been the topic of some (varying) interpretations. The UK also gave some assurances of military assistance to Finland and Sweden in a recent agreement (without getting into specifics, publicly), and so has the US (thanks to @JJJ for pointing out the latter.) The risks for Russia in terms of attracting substantial intervention/interference if it were to attack Finland and Sweden are probably thus even higher than for what happens in Ukraine, let alone what they were for the war in Georgia.

the gods from engineering
  • 158,594
  • 27
  • 390
  • 806