1

Suppose I am floating in space without clothes (don't imagine it though...). Far away from the stars. Everything is as dark as the night. Including me. I can hold my breath indefinitely and my eyes are firmly closed. My body produces energy, which will make it heat up, and radiates energy, which will make it cool down. But what is the balance? Will I heat up or cool down?

Can I overcome eventual freezing (which will indeed happen according to the answer by James Hoyland when I stay at rest), by moving wildly? In rest I produce about $100(W)$, but when I run the fast I can this can be $1000(W)$. So maybe this can save my life while jumping from one spaceship to another somewhere in outer space.

  • 2
    The rate at which your body radiatively gives of energy is probably very small. – Charlie May 26 '21 at 17:22
  • The two mechanisms of conduction and convection have noting to do with heat transfer in empty space. Only radiation matters there. After a while, your body start to freeze due to the radiative cooling. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the cooling rate can approximately be computed if you assume a simple shape (like a sphere) for your body. I think you have to consider a number of assumptions to simplify the problem (Not sure how much). – SG8 May 26 '21 at 17:27
  • 1
    @SG8 But isn't heat conducted from inner body to outer body? – Deschele Schilder May 26 '21 at 17:42
  • @DescheleSchilder - Yes it is, but I assumed that energy source would run out anyway. – SG8 May 26 '21 at 17:44
  • 1
    @SG8 Eventually yes. But I have eaten enough. – Deschele Schilder May 26 '21 at 18:00
  • ha ha ha :) I think the rate of radiative cooling in vacuum is greater than the rate of energy that your body produce there. BTW, you may find this handy calculator useful for any relevant computation: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/cootime.html – SG8 May 26 '21 at 18:05
  • 1
    Thanks man! Always handy for people in space... :) – Deschele Schilder May 26 '21 at 18:15

2 Answers2

3

You will reach an equilibrium temperature where the heat your body generates is equal to the heat it looses. You would radiate at a rate of $P=A \varepsilon \sigma T^4$ ( P is in Watts )where A is your surface area $\sigma$ is the Steffan-Bolztmann constant and $\varepsilon$ is your emissivity - we don't know what that is so lets take it as 1 (perfect blackbody), it would in reality be a bit less than that. Lets say surface area 1 square meter if you roll up in a ball.

So a human body at rest generates about 90W. So you would reach equilibrium when the your temperature corresponded to that power output - approximately 200 Kelvin or -75C or -100F. Unfortunately at that temperature you would already have died so you will have stopped generating that 90W and will be headed down to absolute zero!

  • Of course - should be multiplied by surface area - will fix it – James Hoyland May 26 '21 at 17:44
  • Yeah ok - being fast and loose with the numbers for a fairly unreasonable set up. – James Hoyland May 26 '21 at 17:48
  • I'm not sure if you can consider the human body as a perfect black body. Isn't a black body a body in which no heat is generated and in which the temperature is constant everywhere? I'm not sure if the emissivity is a bit less than one. – Deschele Schilder May 26 '21 at 17:58
  • This will be a great answer with more proofreading and polishing of the concepts. (1) The emissivity of human skin is catalogued for different skin colors. (2) Try estimating the time to death from hypothermia. What do the time-temperature profiles look like before and after death? (3) How close would a stellar body have to be to provide a chance of survival? – Chemomechanics May 26 '21 at 18:00
  • 1
    The generally used value for human skin is about 0.98. Of course the actual body has temperature variations throughout and most of the heat is generatd at the core so you would need to take into account the conduction from core to exterior. I suspect it won't make a whole lot of difference though for an object as small as a human. – James Hoyland May 26 '21 at 18:03
  • Chemomechanics: I'll give it a polish later when I have some time - thanks for the suggestions! – James Hoyland May 26 '21 at 18:04
  • @JamesHoyland - This handy calculator may be useful for checking different numerical calculations: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/cootime.html – SG8 May 26 '21 at 18:11
3

The answer depends on whether or not you include pressure effects in your analysis. If you assume that your body is very strong, then it will not burst in a vacuum and James Hoyland's radiative heat transfer analysis will hold true.

If instead you assume that your body is not very strong, then you will very rapidly explode when exposed to a vacuum before significant radiative heat transfer has a chance to occur.

In the case of a Deschele Schilder "kaboom" event, the analysis would proceed as follows:

We assume for an estimate that Deschele Schilder consists entirely of water at body temperature and ambient pressure (exactly how much water is to be determined by Deschele Schilder). Assume also a spherical Deschele Schilder. We'll place a 90 watt light bulb in the center of the sphere and power it with physics magic, although it won't affect the analysis.

Then before Deschele Schilder can escape this gruesome fate, we thrust Deschele Schilder into a hard vacuum, and then very quickly consult the phase diagram for water (it would help to have the phase diagram book open to the appropriate page before the start of this experiment).

This will tell us that the spherical volume of Deschele Schilder-flavored water will experience a vapor explosion, in which the enthalpy required to effect the phase change is already stored in the water itself, so it boils into vapor all at once, everywhere within the volume at the same time.

Now we have a spherical volume of water vapor at room temperature which is allowed to freely expand into a near-vacuum, at an effective temperature of ~2.3 K, and obtain our Deschele Schilder kaboom (actually, in the airless vacuum of outer space, we wouldn't hear the kaboom but we could in principle see it).

In a free expansion, the only work performed is on the mass of the expanding material itself, which will be accelerated by the pressure inside the sphere of boiling Deschele Schilder.

Can one of the experts here pick up the analysis and estimate the departure velocity of the Deschele Schilder vapor in the vacuum? Thanks in advance ;-)

niels nielsen
  • 92,630
  • Worth a 1000 upvotes! For making me laugh behind my computer! – Deschele Schilder May 26 '21 at 19:47
  • I was hoping so!!! -best regards, Niels – niels nielsen May 26 '21 at 21:49
  • 1
    can't cells, arteries etc. withstand the pressure difference and hold the water? – Andrew Steane May 26 '21 at 21:53
  • @AndrewSteane, not a chance. Kaboom! – niels nielsen May 26 '21 at 22:25
  • https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/survival-in-space-unprotected-possible/ Some (very unpleasant and ethically dubious) animal experiments indicate that this isn’t right, and that animal skin (which is nearly impermeable to gas) is more than enough to prevent an explosion. – J. Murray May 26 '21 at 22:35
  • OMG @J.Murray that is 1) incredible and 2) awful at the same time! Care to do an analysis and post it here??? best regards, NN – niels nielsen May 26 '21 at 22:40
  • I fear that since the original question is about heating/cooling rather than decompression, an answer which exclusively summarizes the latter would be a bit tangential to the main point. If you'd like to incorporate it into your answer, however, the paper summarizing these rather brutal experiments can be found here. – J. Murray May 26 '21 at 22:46