1

For example, a noun phrase might break up into these ways:

You should eat [noun phrase]
You should eat fish
You should eat the fish
You should eat the fresh fish

You should eat NP(N)
You should eat NP(Det, N)
You should eat NP(Det, Adj, N)

Is there a finite number of possibilities for the way a noun phrase might be constructed? Or is there an infinite number of possibilities?

I'm wondering because I'm starting to see papers that talk about machine learning techniques for noun-phrase detection, but if there are a finite amount of combinations, then it seems someone would have a complete list of rules or something out there.

What do you think?

Lance
  • 4,342
  • 1
  • 26
  • 56
  • Just in English or generally? You need to add the nlp tag anyway but please also add the english tag if that's what you're asking. – hippietrail Feb 08 '14 at 05:33

2 Answers2

1

Actually, it can be easily proven that there are an infinite number of possible noun phrases, AND also that that infinite set can be generated by a finite number of (recursive) rules.

bta
  • 61
  • 2
  • I think this is almost certainly correct, but you need to provide some arguments to show it, usually via links. – hippietrail Feb 08 '14 at 09:35
  • @hippietrail It is well known, and often used, that an infinite set can
  • be generated with a finite number of rules. But I doubt that you can prove so easily "that there are an infinite number of possible noun phrases" without being tautological. Because before stating anything about noun phrases, or any other kind of phrases, you have to define what they are. I am not disputing the conclusions you claim to prove, but rather the fact that you claim it to be a provable property of a concept given a priori, rather than a consequence of your own (arbitrary?) definitional choice for that concept.

    – babou Feb 08 '14 at 22:59
  • @babou: I'm not making any claims. I'm just trying to encourage bta to improve their answer so readers can find it satisfying. – hippietrail Feb 09 '14 at 02:19
  • 1
    @hippietrail Sorry. Problem with site constraints. I was really commenting the answer, but as you approved it, I thought it might be a good idea to copy you too. The "+" at the beginning is intended to mean "you too" since the author of the question gets it anyway. – babou Feb 09 '14 at 02:24