2

In "Entré en philo", Jean-Paul Jouary says...

"Il n'existe pas de société humaine sans diverses formes de création artistique, et il n'existe pas d'individu humain qui n'ait de goûts esthétiques - quels qu'ils soient - qui ne ressentent un plaisir particulier au contact de certaines œuvres."

I'm wondering why it is okay to drop the "pas" after the two bolded verbs in this sentence? Thanks in advance!

1 Answers1

0

"Il n'existe pas d'individu [...]" and "Il n'existe d'individu [...]" , ARE BOTH CORRECT, because the negation is already present in the " n' " from the word "existe". This two sentences have the same meaning so, yes, it is okay to drop the "pas" (to respond to the question).

However, using a phrase without the "pas" as a negation is less common, especially when spoken.

Floxify
  • 9
  • 3
  • 2
    The first pas is not dropped, the question is about the second negation n'ait de goûts (...). So you are not really answering the question. – XouDo Mar 20 '22 at 11:46
  • I don't know, it depends on how you interpret the question. – Floxify Mar 20 '22 at 11:50
  • Technically correct, maybe, but okay, not really. Your "less common" is an understatement. Nobody would say or write that particular sentence without the pas and if a student does it in an assignment, I'm sure it will be considered a mistake. – jlliagre Mar 20 '22 at 22:44
  • @XouDo is correct, I was not referring to this verb. I've updated the question so that it is more clear. – user2621707 Mar 22 '22 at 02:21