I understand 'will" can be used for uncertain future. My question is if "be to" is better than 'will' for projections or they are equally good?
Italy will/is to continue to have an older population than Yemen.
(I wrote the sentence)
I understand 'will" can be used for uncertain future. My question is if "be to" is better than 'will' for projections or they are equally good?
Italy will/is to continue to have an older population than Yemen.
(I wrote the sentence)
I understand 'will" can be used for uncertain future.
Not unless you qualify it further. If you say something will happen, that indicates certainty.
If something is a projection, based on past data, then you could say something like:
Italy will likely continue to have an older population than Yemen.
'Likely' indicates the strong possibility. As a data analyst myself, I would not make such a statement without evidence, and past numbers alone are not enough to do so. To say assertively that a country will continue to have an older population would likely need you to have considered other data to conclude that the trend is likely to continue as it has in the past.
Your alternative "is to" just means the same thing without further qualifying it as a probability or likelihood. There are lots of ways of expressing a projection, including: