5

Hansen and Singleton (1982) considers the maximization of expected utility,

\begin{align*} \max \mathbb{E} \sum_{t=0}^\infty \beta^t U(C_t) \end{align*} with respect to the budget constraint, \begin{align*} C_t + \sum_{j=1}^J P_{jt} Q_{jt} = \sum_{j=1}^J P_{jt} Q_{j, t-1} + W_t,\ t= 0, 1, \cdots, \end{align*} where $C_t$ is the consumption at time $t$, $P_{jt}$ is the price of security $j$ at time $t$, $Q_{jy}$ is the amount of security $j$ at time $t$, $J$ is the number of securities and $W_t$ is the labor income at time $t$.

Then, they show that the first order condition is \begin{align*} P_{jt} = \mathbb{E} \bigg[ \beta \frac{U'(C_{t+1})}{U'(C_t)} P_{j, t+1} \bigg],\ j = 1, \cdots, J. \end{align*}

I tried to see it in the simplest case, where $t=1$ and maximize $U(C_0) + \beta U(C_1)$ with the Lagrange multiplier, but I could not get the similar first order condition. This seems to be a canonical example of non-linear GMM.

Giskard
  • 29,387
  • 11
  • 45
  • 76
user2978524
  • 153
  • 3

1 Answers1

5

This has nothing to do with GMM, which is a statistical method for estimating parameters. This is a macroeconomics model or say a dynamic optimization problem.

From FOCs for $C_t$, $C_{t+1}$, and $Q_{jt}$, youg can get $$\mathbb{E}\frac{\beta U'(C_{t+1})}{U'(C_t)} = \frac{\lambda_{t+1}}{\lambda_t}$$, and $$\lambda_t P_{jt} = \lambda_{t+1} P_{jt+1}$$.

Then by replacing $\lambda$ you have $$P_{j t} U^{\prime}\left(C_{t}\right)=\beta \mathbb{E} \left[P_{j t+1} U^{\prime}\left(C_{t+1}\right)\right]$$.

Alalalalaki
  • 2,419
  • 7
  • 16
  • Thank you! How did you get the first two equations (would it be possible to add some intermediate steps)? – user2978524 Mar 11 '21 at 01:07
  • OK. I figured it out. We consider $\mathcal{L} = \sum_{t=0}^\infty \bigg{ \mathbb{E} \beta^t U(C_t) - \lambda_t \bigg( C_t + \sum_{j=1}^J (P_{jt} Q_{jt} - P_{jt} - Q_{j, t-1} ) - W_t \bigg) \bigg}$ and take the derivative with respect to $C_t$, $C_{t+1}$, and $Q_{jt}$, as the answer says. – user2978524 Mar 11 '21 at 18:56