2

Note: This question is related to the following question about complete markets in continuous time. In the linked question, the answer mentions that complete markets in this setting is a result of the Martingale Representation theorem.

I'm trying to understand the statement of the theorem as given in its Wikipedia article:

Let $B_t$ be a Brownian motion on a standard filtered probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal F, \mathcal F_t, P)$, and let $\mathcal G_t$ be the augmentation of the filtration generated by $B$. If $X$ is a square integrable random variable measurable with respect to $\mathcal G_\infty$ then there exists a predictable process $C$ which is adapted with respect to $\mathcal G_t$, such that $$ X = E[X] + \int_0^\infty C_s dB_s. $$ Consequently, $$ E[X \mid G_t] = E[X] + \int_0^t C_s dB_s. $$

In this definition, where is the relationship to Martingales? I see that it is assumed that $X$ is square integrable with respect to $\mathcal G_\infty$ and I assume that it has something to do with the fact that $\mathcal G_t$ is an "augmentation of the filtration generated by $b$." Also, what is an "augmentation of a filtration?"

Community
  • 1
jmbejara
  • 9,345
  • 5
  • 30
  • 80

1 Answers1

2

The augmentation of the filtration generated by $B$ is typically just called the augmented filtration and is defined using the below construction. It is more commonly referred to simply as the standard Brownian filtration.

  • The collection $\mathcal{C}$ of all sets of probability $0$ in the sigma-field $\sigma\{B_{s} \: : \: s \leq t\}$
  • The collection of null-sets, $\mathcal{N}$, of all $A$ such that $A \subset B$ for $B \in \mathcal{C}$. It is assumed $\mathbb{P}(A)=0$ for all such $A \in \mathcal{N}$.

Then the augmented filtration for Brownian motion to be the filtration given by $\{\mathcal{F}_{t}\}$, where for each $t$ we take $\mathcal{F}_{t}$ to be the smallest sigma-field containing $\sigma\{B_{s} \: : \: s \leq t\}$ and $\mathcal{N}$.

The point of this is to endow the filtration with some properties which are considered helpful.

The relationship to martingales is simply that $X_{t}:=\mathbb{E}(X\:|\:\mathcal{G}_{t})$ is a martingale.

Rusan Kax
  • 311
  • 1
  • 6
  • 1
    Note that $X_t\equiv E[X|\mathcal{G}t]$ being a martingale is equivalent to the law of iterated expectations: $E[X{t+s}|\mathcal{G}t]=E[E[X|\mathcal{G}{t+s}]|\mathcal{G}_t]=E[X|\mathcal{G}_t]=X_t$ – nominally rigid Jan 01 '15 at 02:20