10

For a few of my imaginary worlds, my characters write letters to each other. These letters are never intended to be surfaced in the main story, they are my exploration of the characters' feelings and motivation as events unfold around them. I find the letter writing to be hugely useful and helps me to solidify personalities and uncover inconsistencies in my plot. An acquaintance of mine suggested some of my characters could keep diaries, to achieve the same purpose. This advice is not new and I agree that it would be hugely useful in much the same way.

Additionally, I use these letters (and potentially some diary entries) as my daily writing exercises to limber up my story-telling brain and get myself into this other world. There are some great exercises out there; the advantage to the letter/diary method is that it helps me to context-switch out of my workplace and immerse myself in a specific world before working on the main plot.

However, for my biggest and most fleshed-out story (the one which I want others to read and enjoy) the vast majority of my characters are illiterate. In fact, there are only about three (of many) who know how to write and only one of those three would be likely to keep a journal. The work is composed as a series of story-tellings - imagine the author has visited each character in turn and spent a couple nights transcribing their view of past events. Each chapter is a first-person spoken narrative of what happened.

I feel as though I'm out of options for exploring these characters in a more intimate fashion. It's not feasible to me that any of them would keep a diary or write letters. I don't want to write a train-of-thought for any of them as an exercise; because, that's essentially what the main body of work is already doing.

What other prosaic methods might I employ to explore my characters from their own point of view?

Cyn
  • 32,378
  • 5
  • 76
  • 145
sezmeralda
  • 293
  • 1
  • 9

5 Answers5

7

I feel as though I'm out of options for exploring these characters in a more intimate fashion. It's not feasible to me that any of them would keep a diary or write letters. I don't want to write a train-of-thought for any of them as an exercise; because, that's essentially what the main body of work is already doing.

I like Arek's suggestion about singing, even if it might be difficult to compose song lyrics each time. Yet there is another method of oral transmission widely used to tell stories - and that's just talking aloud. So, write dialog. If you can imagine your characters going home after a long day of work, and finally being able to rest their bones in front of the fireplace or with an alcoholic beverage in their hands, and if they have someone to talk to, make them talk.

This would be different from the main story, since you would be writing mostly lines of dialog - much like a script, rather than a novel. No train of though involved. Also, you don't need to make them talk to any other estabilished character in your novel. They may be talking with their close or distant relatives, with unnamed friends, with strangers or even with themselves.

This will be both a good exercise of character development, and a good exercise in writing dialogs as well.

Liquid
  • 15,845
  • 4
  • 49
  • 117
  • 3
    Great idea. You could mix that in with some sort of 'confession' type practice where you can explore some of the more guilt-laden experiences that the characters would otherwise be reticent to talk about. – Ynneadwraith Mar 29 '19 at 10:45
  • 3
    If you want confession, especially in a non-religious setting, then I suggest giving the character a pet. A dog, a cat, a parrot, a guinea pig, just about anything should work. Maybe even livestock. If they aren't the kind to commit to having a pet themselves, then pet-sitting could probably do as well. – user Mar 29 '19 at 12:52
  • 1
    I don't think pet sitting was a big thing while illiteracy was widespread. Either your pet was with you all the time (often working alongside you), it didn't get watched, or a servant watched it. –  Mar 29 '19 at 13:18
  • @Hosch250 In such a setting, that's probably true; but I do believe that many of the same techniques could be used by an author even in a more modern setting. At least Cyn pretty much went with my suggestion in an answer... – user Mar 29 '19 at 16:14
  • 1
    Thank you @Liquid. This is such a great idea and has really stuck with me. I agree it will be a great exercise in character development and excellent practice in writing dialogue. I am going to use your suggestion to supplement Cyn's answer (in fact I think the two answers complement each other). Some of the 'confessions' are likely to come about from just the kinds of conversations you describe above and I'm really looking forward to exploring them. – sezmeralda Mar 31 '19 at 03:24
7

Do any of them have a confessor?

The most literal interpretation of this is that they're Catholic and confessing to an actual Priest who is sworn to secrecy. I don't know what real life Catholics say to priests but, in TV shows and movies, it ranges from very focused descriptions of sins to general rambling about stuff important to them (explanations of where they went wrong, or general stuff someone might tell a therapist).

A therapist isn't likely in this context, but you might imagine there is an "offstage" character who fills that role.

Some people talk openly to the dead. Either by visiting their graves or seeing a ghost or just imagining them (the latter two can be anywhere).

Some people talk openly to babies or animals or to an adult human who is incapacitated. The idea is simply to have an audience who can't spill your secrets.

Cyn
  • 32,378
  • 5
  • 76
  • 145
  • 1
    Wow. This will meet my needs perfectly, thank you. It is flexible, challenging and can be used in a variety of ways. It can even be coupled with Liquid's answer very effectively. In some cases it may be pure train-of-thought (baby/grave/diety) and other cases what the character doesn't say (to a sister/husband/friend) might be just as revealing. This is just what I was looking for :-) – sezmeralda Mar 31 '19 at 03:16
  • As a Catholic, I can tell you a little more about what is said, but if you've ever seen a scene in the confessional (the little box everyone goes into with the wire frame that obscures faces). It starts with "Bless me Father, for I have sinned, it's been [insert time] since my last confession... then you start talking about the bad stuff. How long this takes is based on how much sins you need to confess and how much the priest wishes to talk about it further with you and discuss spiritual advise about the sins. Following this is the priest assigning penance and absolving you.+ – hszmv Apr 19 '19 at 20:40
  • Though tecnically, the priest isn't the person absolving you, God is, but this is a little to specific. Absolving of sins does not kick in until the penance is completed and what counts as pennance runs the gamut from saying Some Our Fathers and Hail Marys (possibly a Rosary's worth (5 Our Fathers and 53 Hail Marys)) to turning yourself in to the police for the crime you committed (My childhood church once had a minor kerfuffle when a murder turned himself in after confessing to the priest as part of his penance and the police wanted to get the priest to testify to what was said to him+
  • – hszmv Apr 19 '19 at 20:46
  • +As pointed out, what happens in confession stays in confession and the priest can actually get thrown out of the priesthood for doing this. In the United States, at least, this is a first amendment protection afforded to the priest under separation of church and state. – hszmv Apr 19 '19 at 20:48
  • @hszmv Thanks for the info on Catholicism. Other than going to a couple Catholic weddings and having Catholic friends, all my knowledge comes from books and other media. Though I'll say, my impressions are pretty similar to what you've outlined. – Cyn Apr 19 '19 at 23:22