2

I've seen a site that has a link structure like this:

http://www.example.com/{title}/about/{category}

Traditionally sites are using:

http://www.example.com/{category}/{title}/

Is it a better aproach to do the first structure? Is it more important to have the title as soon as possible in the URL?

unor
  • 21,739
  • 3
  • 46
  • 117
Philip
  • 121
  • 2
  • 2
    This answer may help you decide. http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/74633/well-structured-urls-vs-urls-optimized-for-seo/74639#74639 While the scenarios are not exactly the same, the information provided is foundational. – closetnoc Mar 31 '16 at 15:38

1 Answers1

1

Strictly speaking it is not necessary to put the title first. Google when evaluating URL's and pages work from left to right and up to down. In other words if the category is first and then the page title Google may rank the category as a higher keyword than the title but this is not necessarily a bad thing depending on your use case.

Based on the most generic definition a category should be a logical grouping of similar subject matter articles and as such you may feel that the category is an important keyword.

Basically though a good rule of thumb to follow is to make sure your URL's are well structured, meaningful to the end user, and follow some sort of common scheme for your site.

Chris Rutherfurd
  • 10,191
  • 1
  • 13
  • 82