I would like to suggest that you apply whatever notational convention you've been following so far in your paper(s) to denote vectors to the zero-vector as well. E.g., if you write \vec{v} or \mathbf{v} -- to mention just two well-established vector-related notational conventions -- to denote that u and v are vectors, then just write either \vec{0} or \mathbf{0} to denote that 0 is a vector (an n-tuple, to be specific) and not a scalar.
Oh, and do be careful with writing a (row) vector as (0,0,\dots ,0): This notation is more commonly encountered for typesetting sequences of numbers, not vectors. Thus, do consider replacing (0,0,\dots ,0) with \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & \dots & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

Observe the use of ' to denote transposition.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
\begin{document}
$\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & \dots & 0 \end{pmatrix}' = \vec{0} = \mathbf{0}$
\end{document}
0character? Please advise. – Mico Dec 26 '22 at 12:06