Can this summation and zeta be created in LaTeX?

Question

Can the above \zeta and \sum symbol be produced exactly in latex? If yes what package to use? Kindly help.

Thanks.

EDIT: This is not a duplicate. I am looking for a math typeface which gives summation symbol exactly as show in the image above.

Answer 1

1. With your reputation you should know you should provide a MWE.
2. Why are you asking how \zeta and \sum symbols can be reproduced in LaTeX, if you already know their name?

If this code doesn't solve your problem, please edit your question and be more specific:

\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb}
\begin{document}
\[
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \sum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
\]
\end{document}  

Edit:

As Mico said, this is the result with newtxmath package:

\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{newtxmath}
\DeclareMathOperator*{\mysum}{\text{\raisebox{-2pt}{\scalebox{2}{$\Sigma$}}}}
\begin{document}
    \[
    -\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \sum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
    \]
\end{document}

Eventually, you could create your own math operator.

Second edit

As you correctly pointed out, my first solution (\mysum) doesn't become smaller when it was not in display style.

I have created another command (\mynewsum) that scales according to the size of the \sum operator.

If you prefer my first solution for display style, you can use a mix of the previous two (see \myfinesum).

\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\renewcommand*{\arraystretch}{3}

\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{scalerel}
\DeclareMathOperator*{\mysum}{\raisebox{-2pt}{\scalebox{2}{$\Sigma$}}}
\DeclareMathOperator*{\mynewsum}{\scalerel*{\Sigma}{\sum}}
\DeclareMathOperator*{\myfinesum}{%
\mathchoice
  {\raisebox{-2pt}{\scalebox{2}{$\Sigma$}}}%
  {\scalerel*{\Sigma}{\sum}}%
  {\scalerel*{\Sigma}{\sum}}%
  {\scalerel*{\Sigma}{\sum}}
}

\begin{document}
\noindent
\begin{tabular}{l>{$\displaystyle}c<{$}>{$\textstyle}c<{$}>{$\scriptstyle}c<{$}>{$\scriptscriptstyle}c<{$}}
\toprule
&
\text{Display style}
&
\text{Text style}
&
\textstyle\text{Script style}
&
\textstyle\text{Scriptscript style}
\\[10pt]
\midrule
\textbackslash\texttt{mysum}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \mysum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \mysum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \mysum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \mysum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
\\[10pt]
\textbackslash\texttt{mynewsum}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \mynewsum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \mynewsum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \mynewsum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \mynewsum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
\\[10pt]
\textbackslash\texttt{myfinesum}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \myfinesum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \myfinesum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \myfinesum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
&
-\frac{{\zeta}^{\prime}(s)}{\zeta(s)} = \myfinesum_{m\geq 1}\frac{\Lambda(n)}{{n}^{s}}
\\[10pt]
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{document}