The following MWE has three entries by the same author from different years. However, when compiled, the bibliography puts the entries in 2004, 2007, 1996 order.
With the option labelalpha (or sort=anyt removed), the behaviour goes away. But I don't understand why these options affect the ordering of these entries. (I thought they only affected the ordering of entries with identical authors and years.)
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@Misc{Costello-1996-Super-reform-press-release,
author = {Peter Costello},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-08-20},
note = {Press release},
title = {Superannuation reform},
url = {http://www.budget.gov.au/1996-97/pressreleases/budgetp4.pdf}
}
@Misc{Costello-2007-Income-tax-cuts-press-release,
author = {Peter Costello},
title = {Australians to benefit from 1 July},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-06-26},
url = {http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2007/054.htm&pageID=003&min=phc&Year=&DocType=0},
note = {Press release No. 054},
}
@Misc{Costello-2004-callback-interview-PHI-take-up-rates-for-seniors-much-higher,
author = {Peter Costello},
title = {Interview with Liam Bartlett, 720 ABC Perth},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-09-28},
url = {http://www.petercostello.com.au/transcripts/2004/2674-alp-advertisements-the-greens-interest-rates-the-economy-childcare-taxation-private-health-insurance-interview-with-liam-bartlett-abc-radio-720}
}
\end{filecontents}
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[backend=biber,singletitle,style=authoryear-ibid,ibidtracker=strict, autocite=footnote, maxcitenames=2, maxbibnames=9, uniquelist=false, uniquename=init,sorting=anyt,labelalpha,maxalphanames=1]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\begin{document}
\cite{Costello-1996-Super-reform-press-release,Costello-2007-Income-tax-cuts-press-release,Costello-2004-callback-interview-PHI-take-up-rates-for-seniors-much-higher}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
labelalphaaffects the format of the labels - not the sorting.sortingsets the sort order for the bibliography. It determines the sort order completely. – cfr Nov 11 '16 at 03:41anytsorting system only works with alphabetic type systems. – Alan Munn Nov 11 '16 at 03:47