The answer to this is probably "no", but I just wanted to make sure... (also, I'm not trying to get into the whole "gotos are evil" debate :)).
Basically, one of the things that irritates me in my current workflow, is that eventually I get to a point where I'm on page 34, and there are a ton of images in the previous 33 pages; so if I get stuck with something on page 34, requiring multiple texing, I have to wait for all of the 33 pages to get done texing first (and this can take a while), before I can see the results of interest.
So I thought, it would have been awesome, if LaTeX (rather, for me currently, pdflatex) supported a sort of a "jump" or "goto" command, which I could use like this:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
% ...
% probably something like this would be needed - pseudo:
\declareGotoMarker{\myjumplabelA}
\begin{document}
% at this point, I'm not interested in the content from
% start to page 33 - so I'm issuing a jump command
% right at the document start:
\JumpGoto{\myjumplabelA}
% here content of skipped pages
% ...
% here is the label, the tex processor
% should jump to, and continue from:
\myjumplabelA
\section{My page 34 section}
Here there is some content that I'm texing:
A test: \problemcommand
...
% here is end of the snippet that I care about texing at the moment;
% don't need a jump here - can just use \stop etc to exit prematurely:
\stop
% here content continues, to end of doc;
% but I won't be seeing it in PDF, as I issued
% \stop just previously:
\section{My page 45 section}
Here some more content, which I'll eventually tex - but not now...
...
\end{document}
Well, I guess the code speaks for itself - the desired output would be a PDF with the content, corresponding to pg 34-44 of the original document. Obviously page numbers, and page and some of the other (section, equation, etc.) references will not be available/working when doing this kind of "jump"-shortened run, but that is understood without saying; the goal of this is more-less to assist with troublesome snippets in large documents, without the need (or despite it) to separate content in section files, and then commenting the \input lines selectively.
Anything like that within the pdflatex world?


\includeonlycommand? – Feb 20 '14 at 06:43\includeonly, and that would be useful if you already are keen on commenting includes. My problem is I have not that many separate section files, but they in themselves are huge - and this would require me to split them, which simply complicates matters for me; agotocommand would save me the hassle, without the need to rearrange files. Thanks again - cheers! – sdaau Feb 20 '14 at 07:08gotocommands withinLaTeXin order to 'omit' some text not relevant for current editing – Feb 20 '14 at 07:56\includeonlyis that it works on\include, and therefore the file to be\included is surrounded by page breaks, meaning that you would need to comment out a document part (chapter probably) that aligns with the document structure when this is rarely what's needed. I'm sure you know this, but wanted to present the flip side to your useful suggestion. – Chris H Feb 20 '14 at 10:12newcludepreventing the newpage. See one of my recent answers, I can't link it at the moment, it is something called 'dividing into files' – Feb 20 '14 at 10:15