129

I have an embarrassing problem: during my younger and wilder days, I used to download a certain type of movie clips and pictures. The combination of youthful foolishness and a couple of beers apparently caused me to put these files in odd places on my hard drives.

My girlfriend is moving in with me in a few weeks, and I am horrified at the prospect of her stumbling onto one of those files. I have been over my drives a few times, but I manage to find another of those dammed files each time. I have huge drives containing hundreds of thousands of files, most of them legitimate and work related, so I can't just format the PC. To complicate matters even more, some of the offending files are named in misleading ways.

I seriously need help here. How can I make my PC honest again?

Mike Rowave
  • 1,965
Scott
  • 955
  • 2
    windirstat for windows and kdirstat for *nix the filter on file type/name – ratchet freak Sep 04 '11 at 21:37
  • 204
    Share your entire harddrive on a p2p network and see what files get the most downloads! :) – Doug T. Sep 05 '11 at 01:38
  • 5
    It would be a pretty cool idea for a software program. It could scan all media files and use a filtering algorithm (similar to Google Images - moderated mode) to detect files that are likely to be risque. Then it could move them all to a "quarantine" folder, and let you decide what to do with them. – jonathanconway Sep 05 '11 at 05:25
  • 3
    If they have normal file extensions and just the rest of the filenames are "misleadingly named" you just have to search for all files of each type and delete the nasties identified by their thumbnails. If even the file extensions are "misleadingly named" then you need a tool that can identify file types by their contents and either give them correct extensions or list them by thumbnail in something like a file browser which includes a delete button. – hippietrail Sep 05 '11 at 07:00
  • 1
    Find all files above certain size (50MB?) - should work at least for the movies – GDR Sep 05 '11 at 21:26
  • Apart from media, you may want to remove web visit traces too. Flash used to be (or probably still is) notorious for keeping track of Flash-enabled sites you visit in its own cross-browser directory structure. (Be sure to move up in that structure as well; it's not just LSOs that reveal where you've been.) – Arjan Sep 09 '11 at 09:37

25 Answers25

144
  1. Use the other answers to remove horse porn and that icky scat stuff.

  2. Talk to your girlfriend. Tell her that you are a normal guy who watches spicy media, drinks beer and feels embarrassed to be accused of the former. This gives you the advantage of building up communication skills and making the relationship more honest and transparent.

  3. Tell her that she is the one and you don't really need these media files any more, she can delete them at any time herself.

Gareth
  • 18,809
fungusakafungus
  • 1,354
  • 2
  • 8
  • 14
  • 37
  • Follow through and really don't watch any of this any more, so if she does find it the timestamps associated with the file will back up your claims.
  • – Joel Coehoorn Sep 05 '11 at 03:44
  • 11
    File times can be faked, so they're not very reliable evidence. After quickly running perl script, he says "Hey look, honey. I last accessed this one 12 years ago!" – Anthony Sep 05 '11 at 05:40
  • 2
    @Duracell: when did this become about proving 'guilt' (?) – sehe Sep 05 '11 at 07:02
  • 25
    +1 for a non-technical solution to a social problem – soulmerge Sep 05 '11 at 08:28
  • 17
    @Joel Unrecommended! Be honest about how looking at 'spicy' stuff is ok (although get rid of the horses, ja) and don't freak out. If she's mega-threatened by you being your own separate person, you'll have bigger fish to fry. – buildsucceeded Sep 05 '11 at 09:50
  • 4
    -1 for a non-technical solution to a social problem. SU is a place for technical answers to technical problems. Whether or not this is right is irrelevant. – Pops Sep 05 '11 at 19:39
  • @sehe, because if his girlfriend has any technical knowledge, she'll know that timestamps are meaningless in this situation. – Anthony Sep 05 '11 at 23:13
  • 3
    @Lord Torgamus: To the extent that's true, it's an issue with the question (requesting a technical solution to a non-technical problem), not with the answers (providing appropriate solutions to the question that was asked). If you have a problem with it, vote to close the question as off-topic. – Dave Sherohman Sep 06 '11 at 07:59
  • 1
    @Dave, I would, but there are technical solutions to this problem. They may not be the best ones overall, but they are the best ones for SU. – Pops Sep 06 '11 at 13:37
  • 8
    @Lord Torgamus, If you have ever worked in IT security you will know that the weakest link in any system is the social one. Very frequently "user education" (in this case the OP talking to his girlfriend about the images) is better than any technical solution money can buy. – Scott Chamberlain Sep 06 '11 at 14:30
  • @Scott, it doesn't matter that that solution is better. It's off-topic/not appropriate for this site. – Pops Sep 06 '11 at 14:33
  • 1
    Since a back-and-forth in the comments isn't really constructive, I'm referring this issue to the community. @Scott – Pops Sep 06 '11 at 15:03
  • Please see above comment @Dave – Pops Sep 06 '11 at 15:03
  • @ickydog - spicy stuff is more like crack than beer. A little beer all the time won't hurt, only a lot all the time. A little porn all the time will f*ck up 100% of its victims. Do a little counseling and you will see. – FastAl Sep 07 '11 at 15:54
  • @FastAl - What? You know that there is no link between porn and bad behaviour, right? – Fake Name Sep 08 '11 at 00:29
  • 5
    @FastAl I'm going to have to call 'scaremongering' on that one. – buildsucceeded Sep 08 '11 at 16:10
  • 5
    I suspect that @FastAI is basing his claims on the observation that over 90% of people being counseled for relationship problems have used porn on a regular basis, while failing to realize that over 90% of people not being counseled for relationship problems have also used porn on a regular basis. That's like saying that breathing causes murder on the basis that every murderer breathes. – Dave Sherohman Sep 09 '11 at 10:53