I have a contingency table which is not fixed, it varies depending on on the data.
I want to know how significant a particular cell is compared with the other cells. Is there a method of doing this?
I have a contingency table which is not fixed, it varies depending on on the data.
I want to know how significant a particular cell is compared with the other cells. Is there a method of doing this?
The term "statistically significant" is a bit arbitrary, because it is defined relative to a null hypothesis. The basic way to test this is to use your "null hypothesis" to define a set of Expected values for each cell.
The standard way to measure the error is $r_i^2=\frac{(O_i-E_i)^2}{E_i}$ (O=observed count, E=expected count under the null hypothesis), which is the "partition" of the chi-square.
Another alternative is to use $d_i=O_i log(\frac{O_i}{E_i})$ ("entropy" statistic).
Both are approximately equal in large tables, with big expected values.
The "significant cells" have large values of these two values
I am not sure if I understand the first part of your question - everything varies depending on the data, does it not?
There are ways to partition chi-square; I am not near my references, but this article seems apropos http://www.jstor.org/pss/2283933
If you know in advance which cell you will want to test, you can simply combine the other rows or columns.