I'm running a mixed logistic regression on a dichotomous variable in R with glmer, with two fixed effects in interaction: one is a factor with two levels, and the other is a factor with three levels. I wonder if there is any theoretical reason why to use "summary(model)" or "car::Anova(model)" to interpret the output, as I get different results from the two functions.
I copy the code and the outputs of interest here below. Thank you very much, and please excuse me if this question has been already asked! I have not found anything specific on mixed logistic regression.
model <- glmer(DV ~ factor1*factor2 + (1|trial) + (1|participant),
data = data, family = binomial)
Anova(model)
OUTPUT:
Response: DV
Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq)
factor1 93.4021 2 < 2e-16 ***
factor2 0.3548 1 0.55141
factor1:factor2 5.1397 2 0.07655 .
summary(model)
OUTPUT:
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
(Intercept) 2.4340 0.4137 5.883 4.03e-09 ***
factor1levelB -2.0577 0.4190 -4.910 9.09e-07 ***
factor1levelC -3.5702 0.4476 -7.976 1.51e-15 ***
factor2levelB -0.8429 0.5352 -1.575 0.1153
factor1levelB :factor2levelB 0.4332 0.5467 0.793 0.4281
factor1levelC:factor2levelB 1.2098 0.5683 2.129 0.0333 *