6

I am trying to solve a question which gives me a random variable with the distribution function below

$$ F(x) = 1 - \left(\frac{\mu}{x}\right)^{2n} $$

where $0 < \mu \le x < \infty$

I differentiate this to obtain the PDF

$$ f(x) = 2n \mu^{2n} x^{-2n-1} $$

At this point, I notice that the integral over the PDF does not sum to 1

$$ \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x) dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty 2n \mu^{2n} x^{-2n-1} dx = 2n\mu^{2n} \left[ \frac{x^{-2n}}{-2n} \right]_{-\infty}^\infty = \mu^{2n} \left[ x^{-2n} \right]_{-\infty}^\infty = 0 $$

Have I gone wrong somewhere above? This is part of a bigger question but the CDF is stated in the question as above.

s5s
  • 685
  • 18
  • You are integrating from $-\infty$ to $\infty$, but the range of the variable is $[\mu,\infty)$. 2. You have dropped the $-$ sign in the last step of your integration. 3. Why are you taking the derivative and then integrating the result? You already have the functional form of $F(x)$! You can see by inspection that $F(\mu) = 0$ and $\lim_{x \to \infty}F(x) = 1$.
  • – jbowman Jan 08 '23 at 19:04
  • To address the question in your title, yes, an estimator can have zero variance. – Dave Jan 08 '23 at 19:22
  • 2
    However, any estimator with zero variance is almost surely a constant, which means its distribution function cannot be this particular $F$! – whuber Jan 08 '23 at 19:36
  • 1
    As far as the variance is concerned, the integral of $2x(1-F(x))\mathrm dx$ will compute it, assuming you correctly use the implied fact that $F(x)=0$ for all $x\le \mu.$ – whuber Jan 08 '23 at 21:21
  • @jbowman https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/comment: "Comments are not recommended for any of the following: [...] Answering a question or providing an alternate solution to an existing answer; instead, post an actual answer (or edit to expand an existing one)" – Solomon Ucko Jan 09 '23 at 14:12
  • 1
    @Solomon Sometimes there are so many issues raised in a question that comments like jbowman's are effective ways to get to the point and understand how best to respond. – whuber Jan 09 '23 at 14:31
  • 2
    @SolomonUcko - I thought about writing a full answer, but my third sub-comment was questioning whether the OP had gone down a pointless path in the approach to the entire problem rather than trying to point out mistakes, which I felt was better placed in a comment. Maybe I should have done both! – jbowman Jan 09 '23 at 16:07