Warning: I am not a statistician, so please go easy!
I have a (not) normally distributed measure of a population, with possible values from 0 to 100%. Its mean is 60%. I need to be able to shift the distribution to give it a mean of 70%.
I obviously can't just add 10% to all scores because anyone who previously scored 100% would now score an impossible 110%.
So is there a formula I can use to shift the population data so the mean is increased, while maintaining integrity of the limits of 0% and 100%?
Edited because obviously this non-statistician elicited eye-rolls from the more knowledgeable people in the room.
So it's apparently not a normal distribution but it has a bell-curve shape. The rest of what I'm trying to achieve holds true so if anyone is able to offer any useful suggestions, I'd still be interested to hear.
Editing to add further information. I have to be somewhat vague due to IP, but I'll try to explain best I can.
We have two measures that are used in a larger calculation. We know that one is inherently more trustworthy than the other, by a factor of about 10%, due to the way the data is collected. That cannot be resolved. However, when being used in the calculation, we need them to be calibrated to the same scale. The thought was that we could shift the population of one in order to match the mean of the other, so calibrate them and give us more meaningful results. Does that help?