I know that when we standardize a predictor, "one unit change" becomes one standard deviation in the predictor, but what if we only center the data on the mean (i.e. only subtract all values by the mean) ?
- edit below: bounty
This example is from Winter (2019: 139):
mutate(SER_c = SER - mean(SER, na.rm = T)
term estimate
intercept 0.66
SER_c 0.11
POSVerb 0.72
SER_c:POSVerb 0.50
Obs: SER is a continuous predictor and POSVerb is a categorical predictor with two levels (0: Noun, 1: Verb)
The author concludes the following: "POSVerb is the difference between nouns and verbs for words with average SER, rather than some arbitrary 0". All right, that makes sense. The intercept should be, then, the value of the outcome variable for the mean of SER. Ok.
But, still, what does one-unit change in SER mean? If it wasn't centered, I'd say "one unit change in SER implies + 0.11 points to the outcome variable for the noun category", but I now that the intercept means the value at SER mean, how do I interpret this?
this post was helpful, but not enough. Thanks in advance!
- edit : bounty:
Hello, again. Now I have a follow-up question:
- 1: My model has a 2-level categorical predictor and a continuous one centered around its mean (no interaction). Should I say "one-unit change in the continuons predictor" or "one-unit change in the mean of the continous predictor" adds X to the mean of each categorical level?
POSVerbdoes not appear in the commandmutate(SER_c = SER - mean(SER, na.rm = T): how can an estimate of its effect on the dependent variable be in the output? Also why is there no effect ofSERon the dependent variable in the output? – Alexis Sep 07 '22 at 19:21sensory experience ratings(SER) oniconicitydepending onPOS(part of speech, verb or noun) – Larissa Cury Dec 15 '22 at 10:47