2

I'm trying to determine the relative contribution of each variable, including the fixed effects, in explaining the overall model. The variance is provided to do this for the random effects, but I'm not sure how to do this for the fixed effects. Any suggestions for how to do this would be very much appreciated.

Linear mixed model fit by REML ['lmerMod']
Formula: time ~ agecat + sex + (1 | Resource) + (1 | Person)
   Data: subdata

REML criterion at convergence: 6699

Scaled residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -2.4931 -0.5373 -0.1770 0.3340 13.4259

Random effects: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Person (Intercept) 7.68 2.771
Resource (Intercept) 18.73 4.327
Residual 638.44 25.267
Number of obs: 722, groups: Person, 42; Resource, 12

Fixed effects: Estimate Std. Error t value (Intercept) 53.5637 2.2043 24.299 agecat(0,11] 10.7435 8.8624 1.212 agecat(11,21] 0.8068 5.7625 0.140 agecat(65,80] 0.9927 2.1830 0.455 agecat(80,130] 1.6798 2.6869 0.625 sexM 6.9659 1.9073 3.652

Correlation of Fixed Effects: (Intr) a(0,11 a(11,2 a(65,8 a(80,1 agect(0,11] -0.118
agct(11,21] -0.164 0.037
agct(65,80] -0.357 0.095 0.150
agc(80,130] -0.306 0.077 0.121 0.326
sexM -0.370 -0.017 0.023 -0.076 -0.017

Cenoc
  • 179

1 Answers1

0

Fixed effects don't have variance provided, because they are fixed, as they are point estimates, not random variables. You can partition the explained variance by comparing the variances of the random effects $\sigma^2_\alpha, \sigma^2_\gamma, \dots$ to "total variance" understood as the sum of their variances and the residual variance $\sigma^2_\varepsilon$

$$ICC_\alpha = \frac{\sigma^2_\alpha}{\sigma^2_\alpha + \sigma^2_\gamma + ... + \sigma^2_\varepsilon}$$

but that's all. You would need to answer yourself what you mean by "relative contribution" because this is comparing apples to oranges, as fixed and random components play different roles in the model.

Tim
  • 138,066