-1

I am dealing with normaly testing of large samples. As stated here:

Is normality testing 'essentially useless'?

Normally testing is essentially useless, if the sample is too large. Even visual testing cannot give a clear statement about the distribution?

So, how to test a large sample if the distribution is normal distributed?

Le Max
  • 3,729

1 Answers1

1

Testing residuals is the classic case where formal normality testing goes astray, see the first answer in the question you linked to. This isn't unique to normality testing, it's a problem with p-values for any very large data set - that is, results can be statistically highly significant but of no practical import.

But I think this may be an exact duplicate question, unless you can give some reason why it is different than the question you linked to.

Peter Flom
  • 119,535
  • 36
  • 175
  • 383
  • Ok so generally said, it depends on your goal how valid your answer about the normal distribution is? – Le Max Mar 17 '13 at 14:09
  • 3
    It depends on the consequences of the amount of non-normality for the technique that you wish to use. – Peter Flom Mar 17 '13 at 14:12