In a simple case with discrete distributions coming from the same family, e.g. two Poisson distributions with parameters $\lambda_0$ and $\lambda_{10}$ or two negative binomial distributions with parameter pairs $(\mu_0,o_0)$ and $(\mu_{10},o_{10})$, you could simply linearly interpolate between the parameters and use the same distribution family.
If you want to interpolate between distributions from different families, or perhaps between distributions that are only known based on their PMFs (perhaps they arise from simulations), you can interpolate between the probability masses.
Specifically, assume that we have PMFs $(p_{i,t})_{i\geq 0}$ for two times $t_0$ and $t_1$. That they are PMFs means that $\sum_{i=0}^\infty p_{i,t}=1$ for $t\in\{t_0,t_1\}$. Now, define a new set of probability masses by linear interpolation for each separate $i$:
$$ \hat p_{i,t} := \frac{t-t_0}{t_1-t_0}(p_{i,t_1}-p_{i,t_0}) + p_{i,t_0}. $$
Then $\hat p_{i,t_0}=p_{t,t_0}$ and $\hat p_{i,t_1}=p_{i,t_1}$ for all $i$, so $\hat p$ indeed interpolates between the two original PMFs. And $\sum_{i=0}^\infty\hat p_{i,t}=1$ for all $t$, since the summation commutes with the linear scaling, so $\hat p$ is a true PMF.
Note that the second approach (linearly interpolating probability masses separately) will not give the same result as the first one (linearly interpolating distribution parameters) in cases where both make sense.