I am looking at how different treatments (3 different kinds of protection of an area, and no protection which is the control group) affect my outcome of interest (deforestation) - in particular, I would like to know which treatment amongst the 3 gives better results. I decided to do matching to improve the balance of my covariates, using Propensity Scores. I saw this post (Matching with Multiple Treatments), but as I have millions of observations in the control group, and ~ few hundred thousand in each treatment group, matching on the control did not seem very feasible... As such, I split my dataset into 3 - treatment A and control; treatment B and control; treatment C and control. The 3 treatments are mutually exclusive, but the control observations are the same across the 3 datasets. Having done the Propensity Score Matching, I now have 3 matched datasets with improved balance.
Following Ho et al (2007) and Stuart and Rubin (2011) advice about combining matching with regression on the matched data, I'm looking to do the regression analyses now. My question is if I can combine these 3 matched datasets to do one regression analysis or if I have to run 3 separate regression analyses for each of the treatment types? In which case I would not be able to infer if one treatment performs better than another?