I am looking to compare two post-hoc analyses, one with the SNK test and the other with the Tukey. I have read that the SNK test is stronger but more likely to commit type 1 errors than the Tukey. Here is my question: if the Tukey test reports a significant difference with p<.001 between two populations, is it safe to conclude that the SNK test would also have p<.001? I ask because I have the p-value only for the Tukey, not for the SNK.
Many thanks, Greg