10

What would be the distribution of the following equation:

$$y = a^2 + 2ad + d^2$$

where $a$ and $d$ are independent non-central chi-square random variables with $2 \textbf{M}$ degrees of freedom.

OBS.: The r.v.'s generating both $a$ and $d$ have $\mu = 0$ and $\sigma^2 \neq 1$, let's say $\sigma^2 = c$.

  • 2
  • How are $a$ and $d$ related? 2. Chi-square random variables already have mean > 0 Why would you need to state it explicitly? (Or are you trying to refer to a non-central chi-square?)
  • – Glen_b Dec 27 '16 at 02:40
  • I've just added some more information to the question. They are non-central chi-square r.v.'s as they were generated by non-standard circular symmetric complex Gaussian random variables. – Felipe Augusto de Figueiredo Dec 27 '16 at 19:45
  • 2M is the degrees of freedom for each of the two? – Alecos Papadopoulos Dec 27 '16 at 21:56
  • @Alecos Papadopoulos, yes, each one of them has $2M$ degrees of freedom. – Felipe Augusto de Figueiredo Dec 27 '16 at 22:02
  • Your last line beginning "OBS" appears to contradict everything else you have written. Could you clarify what you're trying to say? Specifically, exactly how are "the r.v.'s generating both $a$ and $d$" supposed to "generate" them? – whuber Dec 27 '16 at 22:07
  • @whuber, both $a$and $d$ are generated by the sum $\textbf{M}$ of non-standard circular symmetric complex Gaussian random variables. My Observation (OBS) aimed to highlight that fact, that those r.v.'s which are summed to generate $a$ and $d$ don't have $\mu = 0$ and $\isigma^2 = 1$. I hope this answers your question. – Felipe Augusto de Figueiredo Dec 27 '16 at 22:24
  • 2
    Felipe, in your question you state $a$ and $d$ do "have $\mu=0$" but now in your latest comment you state they don't have this property. Which is it?? – whuber Dec 27 '16 at 23:23
  • @whuber, sorry but you did not understand. $a$ and $d$ are non-central chi-square r.v.'s which are generated by the sum of $\textbf{M}$ non-standard circular symmetric complex Gaussian random variables with $\mu = 0$ and $\sigma = c$. I haven't stated $a$ and $d$ have $\mu = 0$. Please, read again. Thanks! – Felipe Augusto de Figueiredo Dec 28 '16 at 12:06
  • 2
    Thank you for trying to explain, but I still cannot make sense of it. Where you write "$a$ and $d$ are independent non-central chi-square random variables" it sounds like you are summing squares of Normal random variables that have nonzero means, because that's how non-central Chi-squared variables usually arise. But later your write "The r.v.'s generating both $a$ and $d$ have $\mu=0$", which suggests you are working with central Chi-squared variables. I suspect these are the inconsistencies that prompted the initial comment by @Glen_b. Could you show explicitly what $a$ and $d$ are? – whuber Dec 28 '16 at 14:55