1

I am a Danish medical doctor doing multiple regression on a clinical study, but I am running into some challenges as both independent and dependent variables have been log-transformed due to skewed distribution.

It is not too hard to find information online when it comes to interpreting my log-transformed results in a multiple regression when only the independent variables are transformed.

How do I interpret the results when both the dependent variable and the independent variables are log-transformed ?

What would be the easiest-to-interpret transformation (log, Log(1.1) etc) ?

My significant log-transformed (log(x)) parameter estimates are 0.2767198895 (95%CI 0.05855987 - 0.49487992) and 0.241749740 (95%CI 0.019216904 - 0.464282577)

I am using SAS.

Nick Cox
  • 56,404
  • 8
  • 127
  • 185
Lasse M
  • 11

1 Answers1

4

If the outcome is log(y) and the regressor is log(x), then the coefficient is an "elasticity". It measures the relative change in y for a given relative change in x. If the coefficient is 0.25, it means that when x (no log) goes up by 1%, then y (no log) will go up by 0.25%. We say that the elasticity is 25% in that case.

  • +1. $y = ax^b$, implying $\log y = \log a + b \log x$, is often called a power function or power law. – Nick Cox Dec 19 '16 at 17:15