3

enter image description here

So what can I infer from this red regression line?

What does it mean for the regression line to get positive residual values or negative residual values?

I know e.g. that I can infer that the more the line is near 0 the more "linear" the fit is.

mavavilj
  • 4,109

1 Answers1

3

The red line is a LOWESS fit to your residuals vs fitted plot. Basically, it's smoothing over the points to look for certain kinds of patterns in the residuals. For example, if you fit a linear regression on data that looked like $y = x^2$ you'd see a noticeable bowed shape. In this case it's pretty flat, which provides evidence that a linear model is reasonable.

Remember that a residual is $e_i = y_i - \hat{y}_i$ which is the true $y_i$ minus what the regression estimates should be the outcome for point $i$. On your plot, this means that the point labeled 25 had a predicted value of about 525 but the residual was around -200, meaning its actual value was closer to 325.

In response to your comment asking more about the line: If the data is not linear, there will be a pattern to the residuals and this is one way of helping you see that. If your regression assumptions are met, you'll get a flat line, as any slice of your residuals should be mean zero (and often normally distributed).

Here is some example code to see what happens when assumptions are violated

x = 1:100
y1 = 10 * sin(2 * pi * x / 100) + rnorm(100)
y2 = (x / 10) ^ 2 + rnorm(100)

mod1 <- lm(y1 ~ x)
mod2 <- lm(y2 ~ x)

The plots for models 1 and 2 follow Residuals vs fitted 1 Residuals vs fitted 2

Notice that the lines follow a different pattern depending on the deviation from linearity.

Josh Magarick
  • 434
  • 2
  • 6
  • Can you explain how to read the LOWESS line? I understand that if it's close to zero, then it's "good", but why is it good? – mavavilj Oct 08 '16 at 18:06
  • It is the shape of the line which matters @mavavilj as this answer and the one referred to by glen_b is his comment above show with many example plots. – mdewey Oct 09 '16 at 12:51