0

I am wondering what exactly means the intercept in the following? Is it a mean? I was told that is the mean of first category. Is it?

Call:
glm(formula = Pollution ~ Temp + Industry + Population + Wind + Rain + Wet.days, data = Pollute)

Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-23.159 -8.522 -1.147 5.823 48.586

Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 111.59357 47.11131 2.369 0.023673 *
Temp -1.26510 0.61796 -2.047 0.048427 *
Industry 0.06542 0.01567 4.175 0.000196 *** Population -0.03975 0.01506 -2.640 0.012430 *
Wind -3.17961 1.81397 -1.753 0.088643 .
Rain 0.50507 0.36118 1.398 0.171054
Wet.days -0.04911 0.16123 -0.305 0.762554


Signif. codes: 0 ‘*’ 0.001 ‘’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

(Dispersion parameter for gaussian family taken to be 212.3861)

Null deviance: 22037.9  on 40  degrees of freedom

Residual deviance: 7221.1 on 34 degrees of freedom AIC: 344.37

Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 2

Farshad
  • 43
  • Since you're just fitting a Gaussian model, you would call this model a "multiple regression". Are you interested in the interpretation for GLMs more generally, or specifically for the Gaussian multiple regression model? – Glen_b Feb 07 '15 at 03:04
  • Thanks Glen_b. It the definition and application of intercept different in multiple regression and GLMs? I know that the intercept is when our x in the regression is zero. I just don't understand for instance in my model from what data points it is produced and what is telling me? – Farshad Feb 07 '15 at 05:04
  • 2
    Well, the interpretation is certainly simpler in multiple regression, given that nice identity link. The interpretation in the case of a more general GLM involves and extra step of explanation. If you only need it for the Gaussian case, you should ask about that case rather than asking for the more complicated explanation required to cover GLMs in general – Glen_b Feb 07 '15 at 05:36

0 Answers0