Is there the equivalent of next in Pry?

Question

I don't see a way of just going to the next line when using pry as a debugger. All I can find is to edit the method and move binding.pry to the next line. Is there such a feature?

22:     def scan path
23:         @last_line_had_text, @files_read, @hands_read = nil, 0, 0
24:         Find.find(path){ |file_name|
=> 25:          binding.pry
26:             read_file(file_name) if file_name.include?(".txt")
27:         }
28:     end

see this answer for a more current solution: http://stackoverflow.com/a/16698615/1396904 — andorov, Nov 20 '13 at 03:33

score 78 · Answer 1 · answered Sep 15 '12 at 04:15

78

Ctrl+D, you can jump to next break or exit

answered Sep 15 '12 at 04:15

mko

20,242
46
127
187

score 19 · Answer 2 · answered Apr 29 '14 at 06:33

19

Recommend to use pry-byebug if ruby version >2.0

answered Apr 29 '14 at 06:33

TheOneTeam

24,336
44
110
154

score 13 · Accepted Answer · answered Oct 19 '11 at 22:01

13

If you want (this and more) debugging features you'll need to use pry_debug: https://github.com/Mon-Ouie/pry_debug

answered Oct 19 '11 at 22:01

deviousdodo

9,113
2
28
34

Ah; I was hoping somebody would do this--it was a pain flopping bck and forth between ruby-debug and pry; cool. – Dave Newton Oct 19 '11 at 22:10
@Dave Newton, you may also like the `ruby-debug_pry` project linked in my answer below – horseyguy Oct 20 '11 at 00:31

horseyguy · Answer 4 · 2012-02-05T11:34:23.330

11

You can also use ruby-debug_pry which integrates pry as a ruby-debug command, enabling you to easily switch back and forth between the two.

A new project called pry-nav is now the recommended way to do this.

edited Feb 05 '12 at 11:34

answered Oct 20 '11 at 00:29

horseyguy

28,690
18
100
139

score 10 · Answer 5 · answered Aug 31 '12 at 07:07

10

If using Using MRI 1.9.2+ then there is a new project, pry-debugger, that is now the recommended replacement for pry-nav. It's by the same author as pry-nav and is faster.

answered Aug 31 '12 at 07:07

nmott

9,324
2
42
34

for 2.0+ see Kit Ho's answer about using pry-byebug. – drewish Feb 10 '15 at 17:14

Is there the equivalent of next in Pry?

5 Answers5