Check for administrator privileges in C#

Question

I want to know if a program is running as administrator.

The user doesn't have to be administrator. I only want to know if my application has rights to edit some secured files that are editable when running as Administrator.

possible duplicate of [How can I tell if my process is running As Administrator?](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/509292/how-can-i-tell-if-my-process-is-running-as-administrator) — Alex K., May 10 '11 at 16:32
I just Googled that question and it looks like I asked it 3 years ago. Good to know. Thanks Google. — Hooch, Apr 22 '15 at 09:57

score 114 · Accepted Answer · edited May 01 '17 at 16:02

114

This will return a bool valid

using System.Security.Principal;

bool isElevated;
using (WindowsIdentity identity = WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent())
{
    WindowsPrincipal principal = new WindowsPrincipal(identity);
    isElevated = principal.IsInRole(WindowsBuiltInRole.Administrator);
}

edited May 01 '17 at 16:02

Ian Boyd

233,966
238
834
1,160

answered May 10 '11 at 16:32

atrljoe

7,845
11
63
109

1

+1 because that even works on Linux (Mono). Gives you true when ran as root/via sudo. Gives false as a default user. – Niklas S. Dec 20 '15 at 15:50
If you build for .NET 5.0, you get: error CA1416: This call site is reachable on all platforms. 'WindowsBuiltInRole.Administrator' is only supported on: 'windows'. – Jamie May 14 '21 at 18:47

score 11 · Answer 2 · answered Nov 12 '15 at 23:51

11

Here's @atrljoe's answer turned into a one liner using the latest C#:

using System.Security.Principal;

static bool IsElevated => new WindowsPrincipal(WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent()).IsInRole(WindowsBuiltInRole.Administrator);

answered Nov 12 '15 at 23:51

Bryan Legend

6,552
1
57
59

13

This is ugly. I'm sorry. But really, you should shorten everythiing. It is bette to leave it as 4 lines and make function out of it. How to even debug your one liner? – Hooch Nov 13 '15 at 23:21
1

I believe that terseness is a vitue, as long as it's clear. – Bryan Legend Nov 15 '15 at 01:49
3

Interesting... I find this easier to read than the expanded version. This has a clear call hierarchy, whereas to understand code exploded into different variables, I need to mentally execute it. – bart Dec 06 '15 at 20:51
10

Another downside of this form is that [you never call `Dispose` as you are required by contract to do](https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20100809-00/?p=13203) – Ian Boyd May 01 '17 at 16:03
3

My downvote is because it isn't disposed of, as Ian said. – Derreck Dean May 30 '18 at 13:53
1

Not only is it ugly, it's not clear what it does. I'm in the "clear and concise even if it takes more lines of code" boat. – Mmm Jan 10 '21 at 19:52
This exact code would be ten times more readable if it were just made multi-line. Comments won't allow formatting, but if you insert a carriage return directly after the => operator, and after the Windows Principle constructor call, readability would be vastly better. Irrelevant, though, because you really do have to dispose that WindowsIdentity. – Jamie May 14 '21 at 19:14

Check for administrator privileges in C#

2 Answers2