111

How can I use pathlib to recursively iterate over all subdirectories of a given directory?

p = Path('docs')
for child in p.iterdir(): child

only seems to iterate over the immediate children of a given directory.

I know this is possible with os.walk() or glob, but I want to use pathlib because I like working with the path objects.

Oblomov
  • 7,935
  • 20
  • 55
  • 98

5 Answers5

158

Use Path.rglob (substitutes the leading ** in Path().glob("**/*")):

path = Path("docs")
for p in path.rglob("*"):
     print(p.name)
pylang
  • 34,585
  • 11
  • 114
  • 108
103

You can use the glob method of a Path object:

p = Path('docs')
for i in p.glob('**/*'):
     print(i.name)
Jacques Gaudin
  • 14,274
  • 6
  • 46
  • 69
10

To find just folders the right glob string is:

'**/'

So to find all the paths for all the folders in your path do this:

p = Path('docs')
for child in p.glob('**/'):
    print(child)

If you just want the folder names without the paths then print the name of the folder like so:

p = Path('docs')
for child in p.glob('**/'):
    print(child.name)
TKK
  • 159
  • 1
  • 6
7

pathlib has glob method where we can provide pattern as an argument.

For example : Path('abc').glob('**/*.txt') - It will look for current folder abc and all other subdirectories recursively to locate all txt files.

Sijan Bhandari
  • 2,801
  • 2
  • 17
  • 34
5

Use list comprehensions:

(1) [f.name for f in p.glob("**/*")]  # or
(2) [f.name for f in p.rglob("*")]

You can add if f.is_file() or if f.is_dir() to (1) or (2) if you want to target files only or directories only, respectively. Or replace "*" with some pattern like "*.txt" if you want to target .txt files only.

See this quick guide.

dzenilee
  • 161
  • 2
  • 5
  • 3
    What is the point in using list comprehension? How does that complement the existing answers? – Jacques Gaudin Feb 05 '20 at 13:06
  • 1
    I was looking at the other answers that were printing the results, so I was offering it as an alternative. But you're right, the original post doesn't make it explicit it's needed. – dzenilee May 05 '20 at 14:44
  • We might as well add generator expressions as well. – MrR Apr 26 '22 at 18:50