In the past, I saw the next css and I was thinking if there is some actual difference between
min-width: 90px;
max-width: 90px;
and
width: 90px;
In the past, I saw the next css and I was thinking if there is some actual difference between
min-width: 90px;
max-width: 90px;
and
width: 90px;
using width will simply specify fixed width over the element without paying attention to its content (so you can have overflow) :
div {
width: 80px;
border:2px solid red;
}
<div>
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/200/100/" />
</div>
Using max-width means that the element will have an upper bound for its width. So its width can be from 0 to max-width depending on its content.
div {
max-width: 300px;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.diff {
display: inline-block;
}
<div>
<!-- this i a block element so max-width prevent it from taking 100% width -->
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/200/100/" />
</div>
<div class="diff">
<!-- this i an inline-block element so max-width has no effect in this case cause the content is taking less than 300px -->
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/200/100/" />
</div>
<div>
<!-- You have overflow because the element cannot have more than 300 of width -->
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/400/100/" />
</div>
And min-width specify lower bound for width. So the width of the element will vary from min-width to ... (it will depend on other style).
div {
min-width: 300px;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.diff {
display: inline-block;
min-height:50px;
}
<div>
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/200/100/" />
</div>
<div class="diff">
</div>
<div class="diff">
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/200/100/" />
</div>
<div>
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/400/100/" />
</div>
So if you specify min-width and max-width, you will set up a lower and upper bound and if both are equal it will be the same as simply specifing a width.
div {
min-width: 300px;
max-width: 300px;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.diff {
display: inline-block;
min-height:50px;
}
<div>
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/200/100/" />
</div>
<div class="diff">
</div>
<div class="diff">
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/200/100/" />
</div>
<div>
<img src="https://lorempixel.com/400/100/" />
</div>
In some particular cases, width will not give the same result as min-width/max-width like with Flexbox where we have the shrink feature that allow an element to shrink to fit its container
.box {
width:200px;
border:1px solid red;
display:flex;
margin:5px;
}
.box > div {
border:2px solid;
height:50px;
}
<div class="box">
<div style="width:300px"></div>
</div>
<div class="box">
<div style="min-width:300px;max-width:300px;"></div>
</div>
As you can see in the second case the element will not shrink because, unlike width, min-width will prevent this.
Another case is the use of resize property:
div {
border: 2px solid;
height: 50px;
overflow: auto;
resize: both;
}
<div style="width:300px"></div>
<div style="min-width:300px;max-width:300px;"></div>
As you can see, we can resize the element defined by width and not the one defined by min-width/max-width
We should also note that min-width/max-width is more powerful than width. Setting the 3 properties to different values will make min-width the winner
.box {
border: 2px solid;
height: 50px;
width:100px;
min-width:200px;
max-width:150px;
}
<div class="box"></div>
This means that we can override a value set by width using min-width/max-width but not the opposite