12

I have a situation where I have a dataframe row to perform calculations with, and I need to use values in following (potentially preceding) rows to do these calculations (essentially a perfect forecast based on the real data set). I get each row from an earlier df.apply call, so I could pass the whole df along to the downstream objects, but that seems less than ideal based on the complexity of objects in my analysis.

I found one closely related question and answer [1], but the problem is actually fundamentally different in the sense that I do not need the whole df for my calcs, simply the following x number of rows (which might matter for large dfs).

So, for example:

df = pd.DataFrame([100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000], 
                  columns=['PRICE'])
horizon = 3

I need to access values in the following 3 (horizon) rows in my row-wise df.apply call. How can I get a naive forecast of the next 3 data points dynamically in my row-wise apply calcs? e.g. for row the first row, where the PRICE is 100, I need to use [200, 300, 400] as a forecast in my calcs.

[1] apply a function to a pandas Dataframe whose returned value is based on other rows

Community
  • 1
  • 1
lukewitmer
  • 1,103
  • 2
  • 10
  • 19

2 Answers2

8

By getting the row's index inside of the df.apply() call using row.name, you can generate the 'forecast' data relative to which row you are currently on. This is effectively a preprocessing step to put the 'forecast' onto the relevant row, or it could be done as part of the initial df.apply() call if the df is available downstream.

df = pd.DataFrame(
    [100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000],
    columns=["PRICE"]
)
horizon = 3
    
df["FORECAST"] = df.apply(
    lambda x: [df["PRICE"][x.name + 1 : x.name + horizon + 1]],
    axis=1
)

Results in this:

   PRICE          FORECAST
0    100   [200, 300, 400]
1    200   [300, 400, 500]
2    300   [400, 500, 600]
3    400   [500, 600, 700]
4    500   [600, 700, 800]
5    600   [700, 800, 900]
6    700  [800, 900, 1000]
7    800       [900, 1000]
8    900            [1000]
9   1000                []

Which can be used in your row-wise df.apply() calcs.

EDIT: If you want to strip the index from the resulting 'Forecast':

df["FORECAST"] = df.apply(
    lambda x: [df["PRICE"][x.name + 1 : x.name + horizon + 1].reset_index(drop=True)],
    axis=1
)
Paul P
  • 2,239
  • 2
  • 6
  • 20
lukewitmer
  • 1,103
  • 2
  • 10
  • 19
2

You may find this useful as well.

keys = range(horizon + 1)
pd.concat([df.shift(-i) for i in keys], axis=1, keys=keys)

      0       1       2       3
  PRICE   PRICE   PRICE   PRICE
0   100   200.0   300.0   400.0
1   200   300.0   400.0   500.0
2   300   400.0   500.0   600.0
3   400   500.0   600.0   700.0
4   500   600.0   700.0   800.0
5   600   700.0   800.0   900.0
6   700   800.0   900.0  1000.0
7   800   900.0  1000.0     NaN
8   900  1000.0     NaN     NaN
9  1000     NaN     NaN     NaN

if you assign the concat to df_c

keys = range(horizon + 1)
df_c = pd.concat([df.shift(-i) for i in keys], axis=1, keys=keys)

df_c.apply(lambda x: pd.Series([x[0].values, x[1:].values]), axis=1)

          0                       1
0   [100.0]   [200.0, 300.0, 400.0]
1   [200.0]   [300.0, 400.0, 500.0]
2   [300.0]   [400.0, 500.0, 600.0]
3   [400.0]   [500.0, 600.0, 700.0]
4   [500.0]   [600.0, 700.0, 800.0]
5   [600.0]   [700.0, 800.0, 900.0]
6   [700.0]  [800.0, 900.0, 1000.0]
7   [800.0]    [900.0, 1000.0, nan]
8   [900.0]      [1000.0, nan, nan]
9  [1000.0]         [nan, nan, nan]
piRSquared
  • 265,629
  • 48
  • 427
  • 571
  • Do you think there is a performance benefit one way or the other, and under what circumstances? – lukewitmer May 11 '16 at 13:58
  • 1
    @lukewitmer No, I just ran `%%timeit` and your wat is 5+ times quicker. I like my way because I find it more elegent. But I'd go with you way because its plenty intuitive and its quicker. – piRSquared May 11 '16 at 14:49