Merging 2 branches together in GIT

Question

I've only just started to use GIT and think its wonderful, however I'm a little confused over what the merge command does.

Let us say we have a working project in the branch "A".

I go home and make changes to this branch and save it as "B". Another programmer makes changes to "A" and saves it as "C".

Is there a way to merge the two branches "B" and "C" together, then commit the changes as a new branch, say "D"?

Or am missing the point of 'merge'?

no need to 'save changes' in another branch. work an A and then merge those different A's together — knittl, Aug 04 '10 at 10:03
I don't follow. A would be on my local computer, dev1 would have a copy of A on his computer, and dev2 has a copy of A on his computer. Both devs make changes, how do i merge these changes together? — dotty, Aug 04 '10 at 10:21
see . the devs probably need to push/upload their repository somewhere first — knittl, Aug 04 '10 at 10:50

score 277 · Accepted Answer · answered Aug 04 '10 at 09:58

277

merge is used to bring two (or more) branches together.

a little example:

# on branch A:
# create new branch B
$ git checkout -b B
# hack hack
$ git commit -am "commit on branch B"

# create new branch C from A
$ git checkout -b C A
# hack hack
$ git commit -am "commit on branch C"

# go back to branch A
$ git checkout A
# hack hack
$ git commit -am "commit on branch A"

so now there are three separate branches (namely A B and C) with different heads

to get the changes from B and C back to A, checkout A (already done in this example) and then use the merge command:

# create an octopus merge
$ git merge B C

your history will then look something like this:

…-o-o-x-------A
      |\     /|
      | B---/ |
       \     /
        C---/

if you want to merge across repository/computer borders, have a look at git pull command, e.g. from the pc with branch A (this example will create two new commits):

# pull branch B
$ git pull ssh://host/… B
# pull branch C
$ git pull ssh://host/… C

answered Aug 04 '10 at 09:58

knittl

216,605
51
293
340

that means that both branches did change the same piece of code. fix up the conflitcs, `git add conflicting_files` and then `git commit` – knittl Aug 04 '10 at 10:20
Say the file in A contained the word "hello", the A amended it to "HELLO" and B amended it to "Hello world". What would be the outcome of merging these files? – dotty Aug 04 '10 at 10:23
Whoops, i mean B amended it and C amended it. – dotty Aug 04 '10 at 10:25
be careful with the word 'amend' that means something different in git (changing existing commits). changing a file 'hello' to 'HELLO' on one side and 'Hello World' on the other side will result in a merge conflict – knittl Aug 04 '10 at 10:39
35

@dotty: While git often *seems* like magic, it can't actually read your mind - if two branches make two different changes to the same content, only a human can figure out how to reconcile them. That's what a merge conflict is. – Cascabel Aug 04 '10 at 14:37
This worked perfectly. Some issues I ran into which I have posted as well. but other than that it was perfec. – Stryker Apr 22 '16 at 16:19

score 138 · Answer 2 · edited Dec 10 '19 at 10:29

138

If you want to merge changes in SubBranch to MainBranch

you should be on MainBranch git checkout MainBranch
then run merge command git merge SubBranch

edited Dec 10 '19 at 10:29

Mahesh Kumaran

770
2
11
30

answered Jan 13 '19 at 11:12

Mohamed Shaban

1,863
1
12
22

15

@luckytaxi: Agreed, sometimes less is more – Marcelo Scofano Diniz Apr 17 '20 at 14:29
Can I undo this ? – Yohanelly Jul 02 '20 at 13:37
1

@Yohanelly yes, you can reset git head to any commit. – Mohamed Shaban Sep 03 '20 at 01:53
`(one the MainBranch)` so what this would mean is git merge `SubBranch` Where `SubBranch` would be the branch would be the basis of the merge. So any changes to `SubBranch` would be applied to `MainBranch` right? Thanks! I tried it out – Ice Bear Dec 17 '20 at 06:32

score 3 · Answer 3 · answered May 16 '20 at 13:46

Case: If you need to ignore the merge commit created by default, follow these steps.

Say, a new feature branch is checked out from master having 2 commits already,

"Added A" , "Added B"

Checkout a new feature_branch

"Added C" , "Added D"

Feature branch then adds two commits-->

"Added E", "Added F"

Now if you want to merge feature_branch changes to master, Do git merge feature_branch sitting on the master.

This will add all commits into master branch (4 in master + 2 in feature_branch = total 6) + an extra merge commit something like 'Merge branch 'feature_branch'' as the master is diverged.

If you really need to ignore these commits (those made in FB) and add the whole changes made in feature_branch as a single commit like 'Integrated feature branch changes into master', Run git merge feature_merge --no-commit.

With --no-commit, it perform the merge and stop just before creating a merge commit, We will have all the added changes in feature branch now in master and get a chance to create a new commit as our own.

Read here for more : https://git-scm.com/docs/git-merge

Merging 2 branches together in GIT

3 Answers3

Linked