Concerning SignalR and SQL Dependency, is it true that the Query Notification can't use aggregate function like count(*)?
Do one have another way or an idea for create query that contain aggregate function ?
Concerning SignalR and SQL Dependency, is it true that the Query Notification can't use aggregate function like count(*)?
Do one have another way or an idea for create query that contain aggregate function ?
Yes,i have the solution if you want to use aggregate function like count(*) to query sql dependency. First in your repository still use select query . But in the reader you just count the data that reader execute the command. Something like this
int count = 0;
command = new SqlCommand(@"select Edolpuz_DB.dbo.TABEL_KONFIRMASI_PEMBAYARAN.ID_BUKTI_PEMBAYARAN from Edolpuz_DB.dbo.TABEL_KONFIRMASI_PEMBAYARAN where Edolpuz_DB.dbo.TABEL_KONFIRMASI_PEMBAYARAN.IS_NEW = @room", connect);
command.Parameters.AddWithValue("room", true);
try
{
command.Notification = null;
SqlDependency dependency = new SqlDependency(command);
dependency.OnChange += new OnChangeEventHandler(dependency_OnChange);
if (connect.State == ConnectionState.Open)
connect.Close();
connect.Open();
reader = command.ExecuteReader();
while (reader.Read())
{
count++;
}
return count;
}
catch { return 0; }
finally { connect.Close(); }
Be careful using SqlDependency class - it has the problems with memory leaks. Hovewer, you can use an open source realization of the SqlDependency class - SqlDependencyEx. It uses a database trigger and native Service Broker notification to receive events about the table changes. This is an usage example:
int changesReceived = 0;
using (SqlDependencyEx sqlDependency = new SqlDependencyEx(
TEST_CONNECTION_STRING, TEST_DATABASE_NAME, TEST_TABLE_NAME))
{
sqlDependency.TableChanged += (o, e) => changesReceived++;
sqlDependency.Start();
// Make table changes.
MakeTableInsertDeleteChanges(changesCount);
// Wait a little bit to receive all changes.
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
Assert.AreEqual(changesCount, changesReceived);
With SqlDependecyEx you are able to monitor just INSERT or DELETE, avoiding UPDATE, which gives you the desirable result: COUNT-like behavior. Hope this helps.