200
t = e['updated_parsed']
dt = datetime.datetime(t[0],t[1],t[2],t[3],t[4],t[5],t[6]
print dt
>>>2010-01-28 08:39:49.000003

How do I turn that into a string?:

"January 28, 2010"
SilentGhost
  • 287,765
  • 61
  • 300
  • 288
TIMEX
  • 238,746
  • 336
  • 750
  • 1,061

7 Answers7

279

The datetime class has a method strftime. The Python docs documents the different formats it accepts:

For this specific example, it would look something like:

my_datetime.strftime("%B %d, %Y")
RNHTTR
  • 1,894
  • 2
  • 13
  • 30
Cristian
  • 40,676
  • 25
  • 82
  • 98
118

Here is how you can accomplish the same using python's general formatting function...

>>>from datetime import datetime
>>>"{:%B %d, %Y}".format(datetime.now())

The formatting characters used here are the same as those used by strftime. Don't miss the leading : in the format specifier.

Using format() instead of strftime() in most cases can make the code more readable, easier to write and consistent with the way formatted output is generated...

>>>"{} today's date is: {:%B %d, %Y}".format("Andre", datetime.now())

Compare the above with the following strftime() alternative...

>>>"{} today's date is {}".format("Andre", datetime.now().strftime("%B %d, %Y"))

Moreover, the following is not going to work...

>>>datetime.now().strftime("%s %B %d, %Y" % "Andre")
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<pyshell#11>", line 1, in <module>
    datetime.now().strftime("%s %B %d, %Y" % "Andre")
TypeError: not enough arguments for format string

And so on...

Aminah Nuraini
  • 16,240
  • 7
  • 82
  • 100
Autodidact
  • 27,238
  • 15
  • 67
  • 86
  • 2
    I've been wondering what are the benefits to using format() for this case, over strftime(). Does either method present a benefit other than personal preference? What are the performance differences? – Andre May 29 '14 at 12:17
  • 2
    @Andre Thanks for your question! Personal preferences are often guided by experience. Please see my updated answer for why I prefer format() over strftime(). Performance and Python are two words which do not go well together. I wouldn't be overly concerned with performance if I have decided to use Python. When I need performance I use some statically typed high performance language. – Autodidact May 29 '14 at 17:53
  • 2
    The format method is simpler in most cases. Compare: `print 'Today is {:%B %d, %Y}'.format(datetime.now())` to `print 'Today is {}'.format(datetime.now().strftime('%B %d, %Y')`. When you are using the format() method anyways, why not use it for the date formatting too? – ChaimG Aug 30 '16 at 21:58
59

Using f-strings, in Python 3.6+.

from datetime import datetime

date_string = f'{datetime.now():%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S%z}'
Natim
  • 16,309
  • 23
  • 83
  • 145
30

very old question, i know. but with the new f-strings (starting from python 3.6) there are fresh options. so here for completeness:

from datetime import datetime

dt = datetime.now()

# str.format
strg = '{:%B %d, %Y}'.format(dt)
print(strg)  # July 22, 2017

# datetime.strftime
strg = dt.strftime('%B %d, %Y')
print(strg)  # July 22, 2017

# f-strings in python >= 3.6
strg = f'{dt:%B %d, %Y}'
print(strg)  # July 22, 2017

strftime() and strptime() Behavior explains what the format specifiers mean.

hiro protagonist
  • 40,708
  • 13
  • 78
  • 98
13

Python datetime object has a method attribute, which prints in readable format.

>>> a = datetime.now()
>>> a.ctime()
'Mon May 21 18:35:18 2018'
>>>
SuperNova
  • 21,204
  • 6
  • 80
  • 55
10

Read strfrtime from the official docs.

Nathan Smith
  • 673
  • 1
  • 11
  • 22
S.Lott
  • 373,146
  • 78
  • 498
  • 766
-3

This is for format the date? 

def format_date(day, month, year):
        # {} betekent 'plaats hier stringvoorstelling van volgend argument'
        return "{}/{}/{}".format(day, month, year)
Thomas Wouters
  • 63
  • 1
  • 8