27

I cannot understand the properties of logical (boolean) values TRUE, FALSE and NA when used with logical OR (|) and logical AND (&). Here are some examples:

NA | TRUE
# [1] TRUE

NA | FALSE
# [1] NA

NA & TRUE
# [1] NA

NA & FALSE
# [1] FALSE

Can you explain these outputs?

Jaap
  • 77,147
  • 31
  • 174
  • 185
Remi.b
  • 16,247
  • 25
  • 74
  • 153

2 Answers2

32

To quote from ?Logic:

NA is a valid logical object. Where a component of x or y is NA, the result will be NA if the outcome is ambiguous. In other words NA & TRUE evaluates to NA, but NA & FALSE evaluates to FALSE. See the examples below.

The key there is the word "ambiguous". NA represents something that is "unknown". So NA & TRUE could be either true or false, but we don't know. Whereas NA & FALSE will be false no matter what the missing value is.

joran
  • 163,977
  • 32
  • 423
  • 453
14

It's explained in help("|"):

NA is a valid logical object. Where a component of x or y is NA, the result will be NA if the outcome is ambiguous. In other words NA & TRUE evaluates to NA, but NA & FALSE evaluates to FALSE. See the examples below.

From the examples in help("|"):

x <- c(NA, FALSE, TRUE)
names(x) <- as.character(x)
outer(x, x, "&") ## AND table
#        <NA> FALSE  TRUE
# <NA>     NA FALSE    NA
# FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE
# TRUE     NA FALSE  TRUE

outer(x, x, "|") ## OR  table
#        <NA> FALSE TRUE
#  <NA>    NA    NA TRUE
# FALSE    NA FALSE TRUE
#  TRUE  TRUE  TRUE TRUE
Henrik
  • 61,039
  • 13
  • 131
  • 152
Joshua Ulrich
  • 168,168
  • 29
  • 327
  • 408