The answer proposed by @nhahtdh is valid, but I would argue less pythonic than the canonical example, which uses code less opaque than his regex manipulations and takes advantage of python's built-in data structures and anonymous function feature.
A dictionary of translations makes sense in this context. In fact, that's how the Python Cookbook does it, as shown in this example (copied from ActiveState http://code.activestate.com/recipes/81330-single-pass-multiple-replace/ )
import re
def multiple_replace(dict, text):
# Create a regular expression from the dictionary keys
regex = re.compile("(%s)" % "|".join(map(re.escape, dict.keys())))
# For each match, look-up corresponding value in dictionary
return regex.sub(lambda mo: dict[mo.string[mo.start():mo.end()]], text)
if __name__ == "__main__":
text = "Larry Wall is the creator of Perl"
dict = {
"Larry Wall" : "Guido van Rossum",
"creator" : "Benevolent Dictator for Life",
"Perl" : "Python",
}
print multiple_replace(dict, text)
So in your case, you could make a dict trans = {"a": "aa", "b": "bb"} and then pass it into multiple_replace along with the text you want translated. Basically all that function is doing is creating one huge regex containing all of your regexes to translate, then when one is found, passing a lambda function to regex.sub to perform the translation dictionary lookup.
You could use this function while reading from your file, for example:
with open("notes.txt") as text:
new_text = multiple_replace(replacements, text.read())
with open("notes2.txt", "w") as result:
result.write(new_text)
I've actually used this exact method in production, in a case where I needed to translate the months of the year from Czech into English for a web scraping task.
As @nhahtdh pointed out, one downside to this approach is that it is not prefix-free: dictionary keys that are prefixes of other dictionary keys will cause the method to break.
