1

Heroku docs says I can precompile assets locally and add them to git repo.

Personally I think there is many disadvantages having assets in repo. What do you think?

907th
  • 891
  • 7
  • 21
  • 1
    I agree that assets should be left out of the repo, particularly if your asset pipeline is small enough to push into Heroku for compiling. Otherwise, a external asset host like S3 might work. This discussion was helpful to me: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7963049/heroku-rails-3-1-app-compiling-assets-locally-vs-compiling-assets-during-slug – zeantsoi Feb 21 '13 at 18:44
  • Thanks for the reply! – 907th Feb 21 '13 at 19:03
  • If you think the link was helpful, you might want to vote it up so that others know. I didn't want to create a separate answer since it's just referring to another answer. – zeantsoi Feb 21 '13 at 19:17

0 Answers0