Difference between Collection and Arraylist in Java?

Question

Possible Duplicate:
What is the benefit of polymorphism using Collection interface to create ArrayList object?

 ArrayList al=new ArrayList();
 Collection c=new ArrayList();

What is difference between object al and c? Are both of them are same or what?

code_fish · Accepted Answer · 2013-01-11T06:19:44.530

The Collections API is a set of classes and interfaces that support operations on collections of objects.

Example of classes: HashSet, HashMap, ArrayList, LinkedList, TreeSet and TreeMap. Example of interfaces: Collection, Set, List and Map.

Whereas, ArrayList: It is re-sizable array implementation. Belongs to 'List' group in collection. It permits all elements, including null. It is not thread -safe.

Collections: It implements Polymorphic algorithms which operate on collections.

Collection: It is the root interface in the collection hierarchy.

The following interfaces (collection types) extends the Collection interface:

List
Set
SortedSet
NavigableSet
Queue
Deque

Java does not come with a usable implementation of the Collection interface, so you will have to use one of the listed subtypes. The Collection interface just defines a set of methods (behaviour) that each of these Collection subtypes share. This makes it possible ignore what specific type of Collection you are using, and just treat it as a Collection. This is standard inheritance, so there is nothing magical about, but it can still be a nice feature from time to time.

This is in my opinion not an answer to the "trivial question". It does not explain why the objects al and c are fundamentally different. — Marcos Gonzalez, Feb 17 '18 at 23:36

score 4 · Answer 2 · edited May 23 '17 at 10:29

4

The second is coding to interfaces. It allows the ArrayList to be swapped for another Collection (e.g. Vector or TreeSet) without any side effects.

edited May 23 '17 at 10:29

Community

1
1

answered Jan 11 '13 at 06:09

Andrew Thompson

166,747
40
210
420

score 3 · Answer 3 · answered Jan 11 '13 at 06:07

3

Same object is created, but reference is different.

So in second case you can work with your ArrayList only as if it is just Collection, unless casting.

answered Jan 11 '13 at 06:07

Nikolay Kuznetsov

9,217
12
53
97

"The question is too easy", but only this answer hits the core of the issue. – Marcos Gonzalez Feb 17 '18 at 23:32

score 2 · Answer 4 · answered Jan 11 '13 at 06:10

Collection is an Interface. Look at the methods.

List interface has methods to access by index. List also extends Collection interface.

ArrayList is a concrete implementation that implements List interface. ArrayList

What you are doing is some abstraction.

If you do :

Collection foo = new ArrayList();

you wont have access to List interface methods. such as accessing with index.

score 2 · Answer 5 · edited Sep 26 '17 at 19:58

2

In al you are blocked to use only arraylists. You can't convert/cast anything but for arraylist.

In c you can convert/cast any class which implements the Collection interface.

edited Sep 26 '17 at 19:58

Peter Mortensen

30,030
21
100
124

answered Jan 11 '13 at 06:12

someone

6,419
7
34
57

score 2 · Answer 6 · edited Sep 26 '17 at 19:59

2

Collection foo = new ArrayList();

This one is more generic, and you can get the benefits of the other implementation of Collection.

edited Sep 26 '17 at 19:59

Peter Mortensen

30,030
21
100
124

answered Jan 11 '13 at 06:15

Sumit Singh

24,095
8
74
100

Difference between Collection and Arraylist in Java?

6 Answers6