22

Hey all, looking to reduce the code on my c# if statements as there are several repeating factors and was wondering if a trimmer solution is possible.

I currently have 2 if statements that need to carry out an identical statement, however the only variable is an extra condition on an if statement when a checkbox is not checked. Im just wondering if there is a way to make it one statement or make the condition string variable, heres the compressed version of the code:

if (checkbox.checked)
  {
    if (columnname != a && columnname != b && columnname != c)
    {
      "statement 1"
    }
  }
else
  {
    if (columnname != a && columnname != b && columnname != c 
        && columnname != A2)
    {
      "statement 1"
    }
  }

Its like I need to run an if statement within the conditions of an if statement if that makes sense, like this psuedo form:

if (columnname != a 
    && columnname != b 
    && columnname != c 
    && if(checkbox.checked{columnname != A2})
skaffman
  • 390,936
  • 96
  • 800
  • 764
markdigi
  • 1,182
  • 6
  • 13
  • 26

10 Answers10

47
if (columnname != a 
  && columnname != b 
  && columnname != c
  && (checkbox.checked || columnname != A2))
{
   "statement 1"
}

Should do the trick.

CodeCaster
  • 139,522
  • 20
  • 204
  • 252
Daniel Elliott
  • 22,229
  • 10
  • 62
  • 82
12
if (columnname != a && columnname != b && columnname != c 
        && (columnname != A2 || checkbox.checked))
    {
      "statement 1"
    }
David Basarab
  • 70,191
  • 42
  • 128
  • 155
mikefrey
  • 4,525
  • 3
  • 28
  • 40
12

I always try to factor out complex boolean expressions into meaningful variables (you could probably think of better names based on what these columns are used for):

bool notColumnsABC = (columnname != a && columnname != b && columnname != c);
bool notColumnA2OrBoxIsChecked = ( columnname != A2 || checkbox.checked );

if (   notColumnsABC 
    && notColumnA2OrBoxIsChecked )
  {
      "statement 1"
  }
markh44
  • 5,528
  • 5
  • 27
  • 33
6

Pretty old question but check this for a more clustered way of checking conditions:

private bool IsColumn(string col, params string[] names) => names.Any(n => n == col);

usage:

private void CheckColumn()
{
     if(!IsColumn(ColName, "Column A", "Column B", "Column C"))
    {
     //not A B C column
    }

}
Sturm
  • 3,780
  • 8
  • 43
  • 73
3

Isn't this the same:

if ((checkbox.checked || columnname != A2) && 
        columnname != a && columnname != b && columnname != c)
  {
      "statement 1"
  }
JBrooks
  • 9,618
  • 2
  • 26
  • 32
3

You could also do this if you think it's more clear:

if (columnname != a 
  && columnname != b 
  && columnname != c
{
   if (checkbox.checked || columnname != A2)
   {
      "statement 1"
   }
}
Meta-Knight
  • 17,202
  • 45
  • 57
1

I think agileguy has the correct answer, but I would like to add that for more difficult situations there are a couple of strategies I take to solve the problem. The first is to use a truth table. If you Google "truth table" you will run across some examples related directly to programming and computer science.

Another strategy I take is to use an anonymous function to encapsulate common logic between various conditions. Create it right before the if block, then use it where needed. This seems to create code that is more readable and maintainable.

Jason Jackson
  • 16,832
  • 8
  • 45
  • 74
1

How about maybe something like this?

    var condCheck1 = new string[]{"a","b","c"};
    var condCheck2 = new string[]{"a","b","c","A2"}

    if(!condCheck1.Contains(columnName) && !checkbox.checked)
        //statement 1
    else if (!condCheck2.Contains(columnName))
        //statment 2
BLong
  • 36
  • 3
0
if (checkbox.checked && columnname != a && columnname != b && columnname != c)
    {
      "statement 1"
    }
else if (columnname != a && columnname != b && columnname != c 
        && columnname != A2)
    {
      "statement 1"
    }

is one way to simplify a little.

gjutras
  • 728
  • 4
  • 13
0
var test = new char[] {a, b, c}.Contains(columnname));

if(test)
{
  "true statement"
}
else
{
   "false statement"
}
frido
  • 10,927
  • 5
  • 34
  • 53
Dan
  • 1
  • 1