0

i have the fallowing class of object with a class a data structure which i use in main combined. The ADT(abstract data type) is a linked list. After i read from file the input data and create and object which at print looks just fine after a print. after i push_back() the 3-rd int variable get initializated to 0. So example and code:

ex.in:

1 7 31
2 2 2
3 3 3

now i create objects from each line, which at print look as they suppose, but after push_back():

1 7 0
2 2 0
3 3 0

Class.h:

class RAngle
{
private:
    int x, y, l, b;
public:
    int solution,prec;
    RAngle(){
        x = y = solution = prec = b = l =0;
    }

    RAngle(int i,int j,int k){
        x = i;
        y = j;
        l = k;
        solution = 0; prec=0; b=0;
    }
    friend ostream& operator << (ostream& out, const RAngle& ra){
        out << ra.x << " " << ra.y << " " << ra.l <<endl;
        return out;
    }

    friend istream& operator >>( istream& is, RAngle& ra){
        is >> ra.x;
        is >> ra.y;
        is >> ra.l;
        return is ;
    }
};

ADT.h:

template <class T>
class List
{
private:
    struct Elem
    {
        T data;
        Elem* next;
    };

    Elem* first;

    T pop_front(){
        if (first!=NULL)
        {
            T aux = first->data;
            first = first->next;
            return aux;
        }

        T a;
        return a;
    }

    void push_back(T data){
        Elem *n = new Elem;
        n->data = data;
        n->next = NULL;
        if (first == NULL)
        {
            first = n;
            return ;
        }
        Elem *current;
        for(current=first;current->next != NULL;current=current->next);
        current->next = n;
    }

Main.cpp(after i call this function in main which prints object as they suppose to be the x var(from RAngle class) changes to 0 in all cases.)

void readData(List <RAngle> &l){
    RAngle r;
    ifstream f_in;
    f_in.open("ex.in",ios::in);

    for(int i=0;i<10;++i){
        f_in >> r;
        cout << r;
        l.push_back(r);
    }
corsiKa
  • 79,375
  • 23
  • 153
  • 199
Bogdan M.
  • 2,111
  • 6
  • 31
  • 53
  • Please post an [SSCCE](http://sscce.org/). – ildjarn Jun 04 '12 at 22:47
  • You're passing RAngles around by value but it has no copy constructor. – Captain Obvlious Jun 05 '12 at 01:15
  • but i odnt see the problem as the prints shows the objects are created corectly... my push back seems to mess it up... – Bogdan M. Jun 05 '12 at 11:58
  • 1
    @Chet : `RAngle`'s implicitly-defined copy constructor will have the correct behavior, so there's no need to define one manually. `List<>`, on the other hand... – ildjarn Jun 05 '12 at 17:14
  • @user1388172 : It either has no destructor (as you've shown it) and is leaking, or it has one and is violating the [Rule of Three](http://stackoverflow.com/q/4172722/636019). – ildjarn Jun 07 '12 at 17:41

0 Answers0