141

Is there a null coalescing operator in powershell?

I'd like to be able to do these c# commands in powershell:

var s = myval ?? "new value";
var x = myval == null ? "" : otherval;
Micah
  • 106,911
  • 83
  • 226
  • 321

10 Answers10

182

Powershell 7+

Powershell 7 introduces native null coalescing, null conditional assignment, and ternary operators in Powershell.

Null Coalescing

$null ?? 100    # Result is 100

"Evaluated" ?? (Expensive-Operation "Not Evaluated")    # Right side here is not evaluated

Null Conditional Assignment

$x = $null
$x ??= 100    # $x is now 100
$x ??= 200    # $x remains 100

Ternary Operator

$true  ? "this value returned" : "this expression not evaluated"
$false ? "this expression not evaluated" : "this value returned"

Previous Versions:

No need for the Powershell Community Extensions, you can use the standard Powershell if statements as an expression:

variable = if (condition) { expr1 } else { expr2 }

So to the replacements for your first C# expression of:

var s = myval ?? "new value";

becomes one of the following (depending on preference):

$s = if ($myval -eq $null) { "new value" } else { $myval }
$s = if ($myval -ne $null) { $myval } else { "new value" }

or depending on what $myval might contain you could use:

$s = if ($myval) { $myval } else { "new value" }

and the second C# expression maps in a similar way:

var x = myval == null ? "" : otherval;

becomes

$x = if ($myval -eq $null) { "" } else { $otherval }

Now to be fair, these aren't very snappy, and nowhere near as comfortable to use as the C# forms.

You might also consider wrapping it in a very simple function to make things more readable:

function Coalesce($a, $b) { if ($a -ne $null) { $a } else { $b } }

$s = Coalesce $myval "new value"

or possibly as, IfNull:

function IfNull($a, $b, $c) { if ($a -eq $null) { $b } else { $c } }

$s = IfNull $myval "new value" $myval
$x = IfNull $myval "" $otherval

As you can see a very simple function can give you quite a bit of freedom of syntax.

UPDATE: One extra option to consider in the mix is a more generic IsTrue function:

function IfTrue($a, $b, $c) { if ($a) { $b } else { $c } }

$x = IfTrue ($myval -eq $null) "" $otherval

Then combine that is Powershell's ability to declare aliases that look a bit like operators, you end up with:

New-Alias "??" Coalesce

$s = ?? $myval "new value"

New-Alias "?:" IfTrue

$ans = ?: ($q -eq "meaning of life") 42 $otherval

Clearly this isn't going to be to everyone's taste, but may be what you're looking for.

As Thomas notes, one other subtle difference between the C# version and the above is that C# performs short-circuiting of the arguments, but the Powershell versions involving functions/aliases will always evaluate all arguments. If this is a problem, use the if expression form.

John N
  • 1,705
  • 16
  • 21
StephenD
  • 3,242
  • 1
  • 17
  • 27
  • 7
    The only true equivalent to the coalescing operator is using an if statement; the problem is that any other approach evaluates all of the operands instead of short-circuiting. "?? $myval SomeReallyExpenisveFunction()" will call the function even if $myval is not null. I suppose one could delay evaluation using scriptblocks, but be aware that scriptblocks are NOT closures, and things start getting clunky. – Thomas S. Trias Apr 17 '15 at 21:41
  • Doesn't work in strict mode -- it throws `The variable '$myval' cannot be retrieved because it has not been set.`. – BrainSlugs83 Jul 03 '19 at 22:46
  • 1
    @BrainSlugs83 The error you're seeing in strict mode is unrelated to the null coalescing options presented. It is just the standard, Powershell checking that a variable is defined first. If you set `$myval = $null` before doing the test, the error should go away. – StephenD Jul 04 '19 at 08:06
  • 3
    Warning, powershell quirk, null should always be compared (awkwardly) placing null first, i.e., `$null -ne $a` Can't find decent reference now, but is longstanding practice. – dudeNumber4 Sep 22 '19 at 21:57
  • An overly clever addition would be to make a `ValueFromPipeline` param for `$a` and then call `$a | Coalesce $b` or, too clever by half again, `$a |?? $b`, which is pretty close. `param ( [Parameter(Position=0)]$b, [Parameter(ValueFromPipeline=$true)]$a )` – ruffin Jan 06 '22 at 20:27
100

PowerShell 7 and later

PowerShell 7 introduces many new features and migrates from .NET Framework to .NET Core. As of mid-2020, it hasn't completely replaced legacy versions of PowerShell due to the reliance on .NET Core, but Microsoft has indicated that they intend for the Core family to eventually replace the legacy Framework family. By the time you read this, a compatible version of PowerShell may come pre-installed on your system; if not, see https://github.com/powershell/powershell.

Per the documentation, the following operators are supported out-of-the-box in PowerShell 7.0:

  1. Null-coalescing: ??
  2. Null-coalescing assignment: ??=
  3. Ternary: ... ? ... : ...

These work as you would expect for null coalescing:

$x = $a ?? $b ?? $c ?? 'default value'
$y ??= 'default value'

Since a ternary operator has been introduced, the following is now possible, though it's unnecessary given the addition of a null coalescing operator:

$x = $a -eq $null ? $b : $a

As of 7.0, the following are also available if the PSNullConditionalOperators optional feature is enabled, as explained in the docs (1, 2):

  1. Null-conditional member access for members: ?.
  2. Null-conditional member access for arrays et al: ?[]

These have a few caveats:

  1. Since these are experimental, they're subject to change. They may no longer be considered experimental by the time you read this, and the list of caveats may have changed.
  2. Variables must be enclosed in ${} if followed by one of the experimental operators because question marks are permitted in variable names. It's unclear if this will be the case if/when the features graduate from experimental status (see issue #11379). For example, ${x}?.Test() uses the new operator, but $x?.Test() runs Test() on a variable named $x?.
  3. There is no ?( operator as you might expect if you're coming from TypeScript. The following won't work: $x.Test?()

PowerShell 6 and earlier

PowerShell versions prior to 7 do have an actual null coalescing operator, or at least an operator that is capable of such behavior. That operator is -ne:

# Format:
# ($a, $b, $c -ne $null)[0]
($null, 'alpha', 1 -ne $null)[0]

# Output:
alpha

It's a bit more versatile than a null coalescing operator, since it makes an array of all non-null items:

$items = $null, 'alpha', 5, 0, '', @(), $null, $true, $false
$instances = $items -ne $null
[string]::Join(', ', ($instances | ForEach-Object -Process { $_.GetType() }))

# Result:
System.String, System.Int32, System.Int32, System.String, System.Object[],
System.Boolean, System.Boolean

-eq works similarly, which is useful for counting null entries:

($null, 'a', $null -eq $null).Length

# Result:
2

But anyway, here's a typical case to mirror C#'s ?? operator:

'Filename: {0}' -f ($filename, 'Unknown' -ne $null)[0] | Write-Output

Explanation

This explanation is based on an edit suggestion from an anonymous user. Thanks, whoever you are!

Based on the order of operations, this works in following order:

  1. The , operator creates an array of values to be tested.
  2. The -ne operator filters out any items from the array that match the specified value--in this case, null. The result is an array of non-null values in the same order as the array created in Step 1.
  3. [0] is used to select the first element of the filtered array.

Simplifying that:

  1. Create an array of possible values, in preferred order
  2. Exclude all null values from the array
  3. Take the first item from the resulting array

Caveats

Unlike C#'s null coalescing operator, every possible expression will be evaluated, since the first step is to create an array.

Zenexer
  • 17,660
  • 8
  • 66
  • 75
  • I ended up using a modified version of your answer [in mine](http://stackoverflow.com/a/38400849/222134), because I needed to allow all instances in the coalesce to be null, without throwing an exception. Very nice way of doing it though, learned me a lot. :) – Johny Skovdal Jul 16 '16 at 18:53
  • This method prevents short circuiting. Define `function DidItRun($a) { Write-Host "It ran with $a"; return $a }` and run `((DidItRun $null), (DidItRun 'alpha'), 1 -ne $null)[0]` to see this. – jpmc26 Feb 13 '17 at 22:08
  • @jpmc26 Yes, that's by design. – Zenexer Apr 08 '17 at 03:36
  • Any attempt to define a coalesce _function_ is also likely to eliminate short circuiting isn't it? – Chris F Carroll Oct 21 '17 at 13:03
  • @ChrisFCarroll Not necessarily. You could pass delegates instead of values and only invoke them as necessary. That gets pretty messy unless you have a lot of options you need to enumerate, though. – Zenexer Oct 25 '17 at 19:53
  • 9
    Ahhhh PowerShell's operator precedence kills me! I always forget that the comma operator `,` has such a high precedence. For anyone confused on how this works, `($null, 'alpha', 1 -ne $null)[0]` is the same as `(($null, 'alpha', 1) -ne $null)[0]`. In fact the only two "dash" operators with higher precendence are `-split` and `-join` (and unary dash? ie. `-4` or `-'56'`). – Pluto May 03 '18 at 01:39
  • Concise answer, appropriately qualified. I didn't know this secret power of -ne. But why doesn't 1,2,3 -ne 2 evaluate to True, False, True? – BobHy Dec 06 '18 at 17:41
  • @BobHy: With an _array_ LHS operand, operators such as `-eq` and `-ne` act as _filters_; that is, instead of returning a Boolean (or array thereof), an array with those elements from the original array, if any, that meet the condition is returned; see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.core/about/about_comparison_operators – mklement0 Aug 15 '19 at 17:00
  • Guys, write shorter examples for better understanding. `($null, 'alpha' -ne $null)[0]` would be enough to show the point. Otherwise, great approach, thanks! – Sergey Nudnov Jun 26 '20 at 20:13
  • @SergeyNudnov It's important to emphasize that more than two items can be listed in this case because `-ne` is acting as a filter. There are significant differences in behavior, and the result is actually an array. The idea is to get you to think about what's happening so the caveats don't come back to bite you. – Zenexer Jul 01 '20 at 18:30
  • Is "_stupidly elegant_" a thing? Using this to zero out null hash table keys saved me so much time: `($fees["closing"], 0 -ne $null)[0]` – Tony Oct 14 '20 at 05:47
15

This is only half an answer to the first half of the question, so a quarter answer if you will, but there is a much simpler alternative to the null coalescing operator provided the default value you want to use is actually the default value for the type:

string s = myval ?? "";

Can be written in Powershell as:

([string]myval)

Or

int d = myval ?? 0;

translates to Powershell:

([int]myval)

I found the first of these useful when processing an xml element that might not exist and which if it did exist might have unwanted whitespace round it:

$name = ([string]$row.td[0]).Trim()

The cast to string protects against the element being null and prevents any risk of Trim() failing.

Duncan
  • 86,487
  • 10
  • 115
  • 155
14

$null, $null, 3 | Select -First 1

returns

3

Chris F Carroll
  • 9,469
  • 3
  • 49
  • 53
9

If you install the Powershell Community Extensions Module then you can use:

?? is the alias for Invoke-NullCoalescing.

$s = ?? {$myval}  {"New Value"}

?: is the alias for Invoke-Ternary.

$x = ?: {$myval -eq $null} {""} {$otherval}
EBGreen
  • 35,429
  • 11
  • 62
  • 83
  • Actually, that's not PowerShell commands. You got them together with pscx: ?: -> Invoke-Ternary – BartekB May 16 '12 at 18:36
  • ... missed actual code and result.. ;) Get-Command -Module pscx -CommandType alias | where { $_.Name -match '\?.' } | foreach { "{0} : {1}" -f $_.Name, $_.Definition } ?: : Invoke-Ternary ?? : Invoke-NullCoalescing – BartekB May 16 '12 at 18:43
  • Oops...you are completely correct. I often forget that I even have that module loading. – EBGreen May 16 '12 at 19:22
5

Finally, PowerShell 7 got Null Coalescing assignment operators!

PS > $null ?? "a"
a
PS > "x" ?? "y"
x
PS > $x = $null
PS > $x ??= "abc"
PS > $x
abc
PS > $x ??= "xyz"
PS > $x
abc
hiroki
  • 51
  • 1
  • 1
3
@($null,$null,"val1","val2",5) | select -First 1
HK boy
  • 1,398
  • 11
  • 18
  • 23
2
function coalesce {
   Param ([string[]]$list)
   #$default = $list[-1]
   $coalesced = ($list -ne $null)
   $coalesced[0]
 }
 function coalesce_empty { #COALESCE for empty_strings

   Param ([string[]]$list)
   #$default = $list[-1]
   $coalesced = (($list -ne $null) -ne '')[0]
   $coalesced[0]
 }
Shawn
  • 21
  • 1
2

Often I find that I also need to treat empty string as null when using coalesce. I ended up writing a function for this, which uses Zenexer's solution for coalescing for the simple null coalesce, and then used Keith Hill's for null or empty checking, and added that as a flag so my function could do both.

One of the advantages of this function is, that it also handles having all elements null (or empty), without throwing an exception. It can also be used for arbitrary many input variables, thanks to how PowerShell handles array inputs.

function Coalesce([string[]] $StringsToLookThrough, [switch]$EmptyStringAsNull) {
  if ($EmptyStringAsNull.IsPresent) {
    return ($StringsToLookThrough | Where-Object { $_ } | Select-Object -first 1)
  } else {
    return (($StringsToLookThrough -ne $null) | Select-Object -first 1)
  }  
}

This produces the following test results:

Null coallesce tests:
1 (w/o flag)  - empty/null/'end'                 : 
1 (with flag) - empty/null/'end'                 : end
2 (w/o flag)  - empty/null                       : 
2 (with flag) - empty/null                       : 
3 (w/o flag)  - empty/null/$false/'end'          : 
3 (with flag) - empty/null/$false/'end'          : False
4 (w/o flag)  - empty/null/"$false"/'end'        : 
4 (with flag) - empty/null/"$false"/'end'        : False
5 (w/o flag)  - empty/'false'/null/"$false"/'end': 
5 (with flag) - empty/'false'/null/"$false"/'end': false

Test code:

Write-Host "Null coalesce tests:"
Write-Host "1 (w/o flag)  - empty/null/'end'                 :" (Coalesce '', $null, 'end')
Write-Host "1 (with flag) - empty/null/'end'                 :" (Coalesce '', $null, 'end' -EmptyStringAsNull)
Write-Host "2 (w/o flag)  - empty/null                       :" (Coalesce('', $null))
Write-Host "2 (with flag) - empty/null                       :" (Coalesce('', $null) -EmptyStringAsNull)
Write-Host "3 (w/o flag)  - empty/null/`$false/'end'          :" (Coalesce '', $null, $false, 'end')
Write-Host "3 (with flag) - empty/null/`$false/'end'          :" (Coalesce '', $null, $false, 'end' -EmptyStringAsNull)
Write-Host "4 (w/o flag)  - empty/null/`"`$false`"/'end'        :" (Coalesce '', $null, "$false", 'end')
Write-Host "4 (with flag) - empty/null/`"`$false`"/'end'        :" (Coalesce '', $null, "$false", 'end' -EmptyStringAsNull)
Write-Host "5 (w/o flag)  - empty/'false'/null/`"`$false`"/'end':" (Coalesce '', 'false', $null, "$false", 'end')
Write-Host "5 (with flag) - empty/'false'/null/`"`$false`"/'end':" (Coalesce '', 'false', $null, "$false", 'end' -EmptyStringAsNull)
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Johny Skovdal
  • 1,869
  • 1
  • 19
  • 35
1

Closest I can get is: $Val = $MyVal |?? "Default Value"

I implemented the null coalescing operator for the above like this:

function NullCoalesc {
    param (
        [Parameter(ValueFromPipeline=$true)]$Value,
        [Parameter(Position=0)]$Default
    )

    if ($Value) { $Value } else { $Default }
}

Set-Alias -Name "??" -Value NullCoalesc

The conditional ternary operator could be implemented in a similary way.

function ConditionalTernary {
    param (
        [Parameter(ValueFromPipeline=$true)]$Value,
        [Parameter(Position=0)]$First,
        [Parameter(Position=1)]$Second
    )

    if ($Value) { $First } else { $Second }
}

Set-Alias -Name "?:" -Value ConditionalTernary

And used like: $Val = $MyVal |?: $MyVal "Default Value"

Elon Mallin
  • 335
  • 4
  • 12