7

Why is the word сосед declined as соседей instead of соседов since the stem ending is a consonant?

Quassnoi
  • 53,460
  • 4
  • 94
  • 183
Steve
  • 420
  • 2
  • 6
  • 1
    Let's hope someone gives a detailed answer but in a nutshell - there are nouns with irregularities in declension and you've stumbled across one of them. Your lessons don't seem to mention this at all. – tum_ Apr 25 '20 at 10:50
  • 3
    I presume you know how to use Wiktionary to check the declension forms. The noun сосед is marked as "тип склонения 1a^ по классификации А. А. Зализняка", where the ^ symbol means "особые случаи отклонений, нерегулярное словоизменение". – tum_ Apr 25 '20 at 11:28
  • 1
    https://russian.stackexchange.com/questions/14821/is-there-a-reason-why-%D1%87%D1%91%D1%80%D1%82-and-%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B5%CC%81%D0%B4-dont-decline-for-nominative-plural-ac – Quassnoi Apr 28 '20 at 15:51

1 Answers1

8

It's just an exception. In Zalizniak's Grammatical Dictionary this word is marked with the △ sign:

  • сосе́д мо 1a △ мн. сосе́д|и, -ей, -ям

http://gramdict.ru/search/сосед

This word's stem gets softened in the plural: соседи, соседям, соседях (rather than *соседы, *соседам, *соседах) so the declension follows the soft pattern (as if the nominative singular were *соседь, similar to медведь, лебедь, жёлудь).

As to exactly why and how this exception came into existence, I have no information. At least соседи is consistent throughout the plural. There are cases when softness is lost in just one form, genitive plural: башни - башен (not *башень) but деревни - деревень.

Sergey Slepov
  • 16,234
  • 27
  • 48