- жить: Ленин жил, жив, будет жить.
- мыть: Раму мыл, мою, буду мыть.
- быть: Я был, ____, буду быть?
Asked
Active
Viewed 309 times
5
Trident D'Gao
- 4,252
- 27
- 45
-
1I like "бычу", by the way. Я бычу, ты бычишь, он бычит, мы бычим, вы бычите, они бычат. The perceived meaning would be somewhere between "бачить" и "быковать" :) – Alexander Jul 31 '17 at 21:41
-
2You can go with old slavonic "Аз есмь" :) – Abakan Aug 01 '17 at 10:32
-
2@Alexander No need in perceived meaning since word "бычить" actually exists. – Abakan Aug 01 '17 at 11:48
-
1Жив falls out from the paradigm, it means [is] alive, 'he lives' is actually живёт. – Yellow Sky Aug 01 '17 at 13:15
1 Answers
8
The verb "быть" in present tense becomes "есть"
Я был, я есть, буду
The verb есть has a limited usage in modern Russian but when used, it can refer to any person or number быть - Wiktionary
Vitaly
- 3,129
- 2
- 15
- 26
-
formally, "есть" is singular and plural is "суть". Though the latter sounds somewhat archaic and used even less frequently than the former. – Arioch Aug 01 '17 at 08:11
-
3@Arioch Только "они суть". Мы и вы - "есть" (ну или по-церковнославянски: есмы и есте соответственно). – Matt Aug 01 '17 at 12:27
-
1@Arioch - Суть is an extremely rarely used bookish word. And yes, always with archaic connotations. – Yellow Sky Aug 01 '17 at 13:12
-
@Matt а "суть" тогда как "по церковно-славянски" - так и остаётся "суть" ? – Arioch Aug 02 '17 at 09:12
-
-
@Arioch Но это только во множественном числе. В двойственном все по-другому. – Matt Aug 02 '17 at 11:48
-
When talking about archaic forms, we should mention есмь (я есмь) — this is definitely old but still can be seen in books sometimes or heard in speech of some nerds (like myself :)) or people related to the orthodox church. – Andre Polykanine Aug 09 '17 at 13:09