14

Say we are looking at European Call options in a toy environment with zero deterministic interest rates, a stock paying no dividends, no repo rates etc...

Let $C(T,K)$ be the price of a call with expiry $T$ and strike $K$.

If for $T1 < T2$, $C(T1,K) > C(T2,K)$ then this is calendar arbitrage.

Please explain how should one exploit this arbitrage opportunity.

Thank you.

JejeBelfort
  • 1,219
  • 11
  • 24
Alexander Chertov
  • 243
  • 1
  • 2
  • 6

3 Answers3

13

The answer by @HenriK is certainly correct. However, for justification, technique such as the Jensen inequality is needed. For example, since $x^+$ is a convex function, assuming zero interest and zero divdiend, \begin{align*} E\big((S_{T_{2}}-K)^+ \mid \mathcal{F}_{T_1} \big) &\ge \big(E(S_{T_{2}} \mid \mathcal{F}_{T_1})-K\big)^+\\ &=(S_{T_1}-K)^+. \end{align*} That is, $C(T_2) - (S_{T_1}-K)^+\ge 0$. Then, \begin{align*} C(T_2) - (S_{T_1}-K)^+ + x > 0. \end{align*}

Alternatively, if we short the option with maturity $T_1$ and long the option with with maturity $T_2$, then we have the initial profit $x= C(T_1)-C(T_2) > 0$.

At time $T_1$, if $S_{T_1}\le K$, the shorted option expires worthless, and then we have the total profit $(S_{T_2}-K)^++x$.

On the other hand, if $S_{T_1} > K$, the option is exercised, then, we short sell the stock (i.e., borrow and sell) and receive $K$. At time $T_2$, if $S_{T_2} > K$, we buy the stock by paying the amount $K$ that we had received at $T_1$, and return the stock that we had short sold at $T_1$. The net profit for our trading strategy is $x$, that is, the initial profit. On the other hand, if $S_{T_2} < K$, we buy the stock by paying $S_{T_2}$ and return the stock that we short sold at $T_1$. Note that, we had received $K$ at time $T_1$, our net profit is then $K-S_{T_2} + x>x>0$.

Gordon
  • 21,114
  • 1
  • 35
  • 80
  • The mandatory no dividends, no interest rates should be placed in bold. $S_t$ must be a martingale for the Jensen inequality to hold – jherek Feb 03 '23 at 10:46
5

You should always think: I buy the one which is too cheap and sell the one that is too expensive and figure it out.

The figuring out in this case is noting that:

  • $C\geq 0$ since it will never cost you money
  • The option is strictly better than $S-K$ so has a higher price.

Now to your strategy: You buy $C(T_2)$ (the cheap) and sell $C(T_1)$ (the expensive), call the difference $x>0$. At $T_1$ your position is

$C(T_2) - \max\{S_{T_1}-K,0\} + x$

The first term we have just argued is non-negative, the second is strictly positive. Arbitrage :)

htd
  • 493
  • 4
  • 18
-3

you need to check implied volatility... Calendars must be opened when IV is low, hopping that will increase, that way you will capture the volatility increase.

Ariel Silahian
  • 425
  • 3
  • 14