10

Things were quite different in 3000 AD. We'd discovered other planets with sentient life for instance. Five to be precise. Adam, Bill, Carl, Dave, and Eric we called them, and we used the lately discovered instantaneon beams to communicate without delay across the vast distances between us. Light-speed communication was so last millenum. Of course there were the recreational 'radio' operators on each planet as well... they'd set up an instantaneon channel (Channel A) on which any signals on one of the light-speed channels (Channel B) were recorded by stations on each planet and broadcast instantaneously across the universe. Channel B stations on each planet recorded the signals on Channel A and broadcast them into the universe at light-speed.

One time we had a solar flare, and our silly Channel A station broadcast a blip accidentally across the universe. Some time later (I don't recall how long), the Channel B recordings of that blip started coming in as five bleeps from our five friends, at intervals (surprisingly enough) of exactly a year.

Later, Eric's star supernovaed. It kind of sucked knowing that an entire planet got wiped out like that, but life continued on. Adam, Bill, Carl and Dave became our best friends in the sky; from anywhere on earth you could look out and see at least one of them.

Anyway, later we had another solar flare and we sent out a blip on Channel A again, but this time we noticed something interesting. The blip of course came back to us on Channel A as well, from each station on Adam, Bill, Carl and Dave recording the resulting Channel B bleep from the other three. A certain period of time after the flare we heard a blip, and less than half that time later another one, but those 2 blips were all we got on Channel A. Some of the planets' stations must have received some of the Channel B bleeps at the same time.

Question: How far apart in time did we receive these two blips?


Assume no relative motion of the planets. Assume the galaxy is flat - all planets within it lie in a plane. Ignore any other blips or bleeps that might be generated in this situation - the only ones we are considering are the Channel B bleeps from the five planets in response to our Channel A blip, and for the second flare, the channel A blips resulting from the four planets' receipt of each of the other three's Channel B bleeps in response to our blip. Assume the stations' recording and broadcasting is instantaneous.

This is a mathematical puzzle, not a lateral thinking puzzle. There is nothing hidden in the text; interpreting the situation described in the puzzle at face value leads to a single unique solution. I believe this mathematical problem is interesting as a puzzle because it seems (I think) quite surprising that a unique solution exists given the limited data. While it is entirely possible to solve this puzzle by hand (I did - the underlying mathematical problem is one I once formulated to myself as a puzzle and solved by hand; I thought it might be interesting dressed up in the form of this story), there is some work involved, for which computer assistance is allowable. An exact expression for the answer is preferred.

Anon
  • 5,342
  • 2
  • 13
  • 45
  • The 5 bleeps that were recorded during the first solar flare, do we know where each bleep originated from? Or we just recorded them? – Yuzuriha Inori May 07 '20 at 13:17
  • @YuzurihaInori We do not know from which planet each originated. – Anon May 07 '20 at 13:31
  • That is interesting, given that it is the year 3000 :P – Yuzuriha Inori May 07 '20 at 13:31
  • @YuzurihaInori At least you don't know for the purposes of the puzzle ;) On another note, I altered the sentence about the city lights, to more accurately describe a fact about these planets (which could have been misinterpreted in the way it was stated previously). – Anon May 07 '20 at 13:36
  • 1
    This does put an useful extra constraint to the problem... – Yuzuriha Inori May 07 '20 at 13:38
  • Wait, does this mean that rot13(Fbzr cynargf pna pbire gur fvtanyf bs fbzr cynarg?) – Yuzuriha Inori May 07 '20 at 13:40
  • @YuzurihaInori No. Assume these signals simply propagate in all directions throughout the universe, either instantaneously (A) or at light speed (B). No interactions between channels and planets apart from the Channel A stations recording and broadcasting the contents of B, and vice versa. – Anon May 07 '20 at 13:42
  • The second statement of the comment helps. The first statement is in direct contradiction to the second statement if the planets are not transparent. But I am just being pedantic forgive me :) – Yuzuriha Inori May 07 '20 at 13:44
  • @YuzurihaInori If you stand between me and a radio tower, I can still hear the radio. But regardless, this setup is (obviously) not perfectly physically accurate. – Anon May 07 '20 at 13:46
  • 1
    Yeah I understand, I am just being an idiot. (But me being the idiot, I can't help but see that if the radio tower is smaller than you, and there are no reflective materials around (space for example), then you can't hear the radio. This is why satellites go out of contact for a brief moment if something comes in between the pin point signal and Earth.) – Yuzuriha Inori May 07 '20 at 13:48
  • @YuzurihaInori In fact to be pedantic, while my physics is weak I think if you're much smaller than the wavelength of the radio waves, they will actually diffract around you. – Anon May 07 '20 at 13:53
  • I have to be much much smaller, but yeah. Well this isn't a problem if Jupiter suddenly comes in front of voyager. But I know it's a mathematical problem, so let's chill here. The physics doesn't matter. – Yuzuriha Inori May 07 '20 at 13:54

1 Answers1

8

Let's start with the information in the third paragraph. Essentially it tells us that the mutual distances between the planets Adam, Bill, Carl and Dave have exactly two distinct values. Since Adam, Bill, Carl and Dave are in a single common plane, this means that they must be arranged in one of the following six constellations:

enter image description here

The ratio between these lengths is, in reading order: $\sqrt{2} \approx 1.41$, $\frac{\sqrt{5}+1}{2} \approx 1.62$, twice $\sqrt{3} \approx 1.73$, and twice $\frac{\sqrt{6}+\sqrt{2}}{2} \approx 1.93$. Now since the second signal arrived within half again the time of the first signal, the larger of the two distances must be less than $1.5$ times the shorter distance, so the only permitted constellation is the square.


Let's say Adam, Bill, Carl and Dave are at points $A,B,C,D$, and Earth is at $X$. Because of the information in the first paragraph, we know that $a = |XA|$, $b = |XB|$, $c = |XC|$, $d = |XD|$ are four of five consecutive terms of an arithmetic progression (the remaining one would be the distance between Earth and Eric). By trial and error (repeat the following steps until we find a solution) it turns out that $|XE|$ must be the second term. Suppose $a$ is the lowest term, and $b$ is the third lowest. Then it is true that $2b = a + d$ and $2c = b + d$.

We can use coordinate geometry to figure this out. Let $ACDB$ be the standard unit square with $A = (0,0), B = (0,1), C = (1,0), D = (1,1)$, and suppose that $X = (x,y)$. We find $a = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}$, $b = \sqrt{x^2+(y-1)^2}$, and so on. Substituting these into the previous two equations and squaring the radicals away yields a system of two quartic equations in $x$ and $y$ that Wolfram Alpha can solve. There are three real solutions to this system of equations. One is $(1/2, 1/2)$, which would make $X$ the center of the square, but we can exclude that since we know that $a,b,c,d$ are not all the same. Of the two remaining solutions, one lies outside of the square, but paragraph 2 excludes that possibility. So only one possibility for $X$ remains, at coordinates $(\frac{63\sqrt{17}-161}{848}, \frac{35\sqrt{17}+99}{848})$.


Finally, we can compute the solution to the problem. We know that $|XD|-|XC|$ is exactly one lightyear, and we want to know $|BC|-|BD|$ in lightyears, so the answer is $$\frac{|BC|-|BD|}{|XD|-|XC|} = \frac{\sqrt{2}-1}{2}\sqrt{65+7\sqrt{17}} \approx 2.01.$$

Magma
  • 5,259
  • 13
  • 30
  • Nice answer! I'll upvote in a few hours as soon as my daily vote limit passes. I know this is the correct unique solution since I solved it and checked all the cases by hand, but some steps of this answer are a bit of a black box for anyone who hasn't solved the problem, so I'll wait before I accept to see if you or anyone provides an answer explaining these details a bit more. Nice work though! – Anon May 07 '20 at 20:40
  • 1
    If you have specific details in mind, I wouldn't mind expanding on them, although I'm not gonna solve a system of two quartics in two variables by hand. – Magma May 07 '20 at 23:28
  • Haha I wouldn't expect you to. I did allow computer assistance. But describing the other mathematical steps (e.g. in your example writing the quartic) might help a reader understand your method, or e.g. explaining how you deduced $|EX|$ was the second term. It's not even clear to me exactly what you did (I solved the problem a slightly different way, more amenable to hand solving). I don't want you to change your method, but (while it's obviously up to you to change anything about your answer) was just suggesting explaining some of your maths steps might make the answer more accessible. – Anon May 08 '20 at 00:47
  • Nice work! That's clearer now. – Anon May 08 '20 at 01:54
  • 1
    For further explanation of the six configurations of 4 points, see the previous question Four points with only two distances, – Jaap Scherphuis May 08 '20 at 04:26